Unpacking the Regulatory Ambiguity Mechanism: Implications for Industry-Level Digital Transformation

IF 6.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Karin Väyrynen, Arto Lanamäki, Sari Laari-Salmela, Netta Iivari, Marianne Kinnula
{"title":"Unpacking the Regulatory Ambiguity Mechanism: Implications for Industry-Level Digital Transformation","authors":"Karin Väyrynen,&nbsp;Arto Lanamäki,&nbsp;Sari Laari-Salmela,&nbsp;Netta Iivari,&nbsp;Marianne Kinnula","doi":"10.1111/isj.12595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between digital transformation and regulation is complex and bidirectional: regulation both drives and responds to changes in the technology landscape. Moreover, regulatory efforts to shape industry-level digital transformation often produce unwanted outcomes. Existing theories are insufficient for examining this complex relationship between regulation and digital transformation. Our case study of the Finnish taxi industry illustrates these complexities. The industry underwent a legal reform intended to legalise Uber-type solutions while restricting certain other solutions. By drawing on the notion of regulatory ambiguity and mechanism-based explanation, we show how ambiguity arises from the imprecise regulation in connection with conflicting regulation and technological uncertainties. We model the regulatory ambiguity mechanism consisting of the interconnected elements that, by affecting each other and working together, drive unintended changes in the technology landscape. We theorise regulatory ambiguity as a condition that emerges when regulations are imprecise, inconsistent, or evolving. This ambiguity shapes the technology landscape and related industry-specific practices, impacting digital transformation. Our research contributes to the literature on digital transformation and on the regulation of technology. We identify and analyse the regulatory ambiguity mechanism, providing information systems (IS) researchers with a novel framework to examine the role of regulation in digital transformation. We also conceptualise regulatory impact as a lens for future IS research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 6","pages":"1528-1564"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12595","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between digital transformation and regulation is complex and bidirectional: regulation both drives and responds to changes in the technology landscape. Moreover, regulatory efforts to shape industry-level digital transformation often produce unwanted outcomes. Existing theories are insufficient for examining this complex relationship between regulation and digital transformation. Our case study of the Finnish taxi industry illustrates these complexities. The industry underwent a legal reform intended to legalise Uber-type solutions while restricting certain other solutions. By drawing on the notion of regulatory ambiguity and mechanism-based explanation, we show how ambiguity arises from the imprecise regulation in connection with conflicting regulation and technological uncertainties. We model the regulatory ambiguity mechanism consisting of the interconnected elements that, by affecting each other and working together, drive unintended changes in the technology landscape. We theorise regulatory ambiguity as a condition that emerges when regulations are imprecise, inconsistent, or evolving. This ambiguity shapes the technology landscape and related industry-specific practices, impacting digital transformation. Our research contributes to the literature on digital transformation and on the regulation of technology. We identify and analyse the regulatory ambiguity mechanism, providing information systems (IS) researchers with a novel framework to examine the role of regulation in digital transformation. We also conceptualise regulatory impact as a lens for future IS research.

Abstract Image

解读监管模糊机制:对行业数字化转型的启示
数字化转型与监管之间的关系是复杂和双向的:监管既驱动又响应技术格局的变化。此外,监管机构为塑造行业层面的数字化转型所做的努力往往会产生意想不到的结果。现有的理论不足以检验监管与数字化转型之间的复杂关系。我们对芬兰出租车行业的案例研究说明了这些复杂性。该行业经历了一场法律改革,旨在使优步式的解决方案合法化,同时限制某些其他解决方案。通过借鉴监管模糊性的概念和基于机制的解释,我们展示了模糊性是如何从与冲突监管和技术不确定性相关的不精确监管中产生的。我们模拟了由相互关联的元素组成的监管模糊机制,这些元素通过相互影响和共同努力,推动了技术领域意想不到的变化。我们将监管模糊性理论化为当监管不精确、不一致或不断发展时出现的一种情况。这种模糊性塑造了技术格局和相关行业的特定实践,影响了数字化转型。我们的研究对数字化转型和技术监管的文献有贡献。我们识别并分析了监管模糊机制,为信息系统(IS)研究人员提供了一个新的框架来研究监管在数字化转型中的作用。我们还将监管影响概念化,作为未来IS研究的一个视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信