Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Prafull P. Yadav, Rajmal Jat, Sachin D. Ghude, Gaurav Govardhan, Rajesh Kumar, Sreyashi Debnath, Gayatri Kalita, Chinmay Jena, V. K. Soni, A. Jayakumar, T. J. Anurose, Shweta Bhati, Alqamah Sayeed, Junhyeon Seo, Pawan Gupta, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Johannes Flemming, Kamaljit Ray, S. D. Atri
{"title":"Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India","authors":"Prafull P. Yadav,&nbsp;Rajmal Jat,&nbsp;Sachin D. Ghude,&nbsp;Gaurav Govardhan,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Sreyashi Debnath,&nbsp;Gayatri Kalita,&nbsp;Chinmay Jena,&nbsp;V. K. Soni,&nbsp;A. Jayakumar,&nbsp;T. J. Anurose,&nbsp;Shweta Bhati,&nbsp;Alqamah Sayeed,&nbsp;Junhyeon Seo,&nbsp;Pawan Gupta,&nbsp;Partha S. Bhattacharjee,&nbsp;Johannes Flemming,&nbsp;Kamaljit Ray,&nbsp;S. D. Atri","doi":"10.1029/2025JD043719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate forecasting of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi-model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF-Chem, SILAM, and DM-Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS-FP, GEFS-Aerosols, and the machine learning-based GEOS-ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF-Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS-ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52), and GEFS-Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high-pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data-driven decision-making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD043719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM2.5 concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi-model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF-Chem, SILAM, and DM-Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS-FP, GEFS-Aerosols, and the machine learning-based GEOS-ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF-Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS-ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52), and GEFS-Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high-pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data-driven decision-making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.

Abstract Image

评估区域和全球PM2.5准确预测和空气质量指数评估模型在印度德里的表现
准确预测PM2.5(颗粒物质≤2.5 μm)对于有效的空气质量管理至关重要,特别是在德里等经常发生严重污染事件的城市地区。本研究评估了区域和全球预测模型对印度德里PM2.5浓度和相关空气质量指数(AQI)的预测能力。使用三个区域模型(WRF-Chem、SILAM和DM-Chem)和四个全局模型(IFS、gefs - fp、gefs - aerosol和基于机器学习的GEOS-ML)进行了多模型评估。这些模型的预测与德里39个中央污染控制委员会(CPCB)站每小时的现场测量结果进行了验证。结果表明,基于WRF-Chem的空气质量预警系统(AQEWS)具有最高的预测精度(性能指数,PI = 87),与观测值的偏差最小。GEOS-ML模型(PI = 70)使用机器学习方法有效捕获关键变量。DM-Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61)显示出合理的一致性,而IFS (PI = 60), GEOS-FP (PI = 52)和gefs - aerosol (PI = 47)以不同的精度捕获了更广泛的趋势。在高污染事件中,SILAM (PI = 58)表现出显著差异。这项研究强调需要对预报系统进行严格的评估,以加强对德里等受污染城市环境的空气质量预测。确定最可靠的模型有助于数据驱动的决策,以减轻空气污染和保护公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信