How Are People Undergoing Dialysis Expected to Benefit From Cognitive Behavioural Therapy? A Realist Analysis

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katrin Micklitz, Joanne Greenhalgh, Lori Suet Hang Lo, Richard Sawatzky, Kara Schick-Makaroff
{"title":"How Are People Undergoing Dialysis Expected to Benefit From Cognitive Behavioural Therapy? A Realist Analysis","authors":"Katrin Micklitz,&nbsp;Joanne Greenhalgh,&nbsp;Lori Suet Hang Lo,&nbsp;Richard Sawatzky,&nbsp;Kara Schick-Makaroff","doi":"10.1111/hex.70466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Depressive symptoms remain inadequately addressed and undertreated in people who receive life-prolonging dialysis treatment. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective for treating depression; however, we lack an understanding of how and under what circumstances people with depressive symptoms receiving dialysis may benefit from it. The aim of this study is to identify ideas underlying CBT in general and develop an initial programme theory that explains how these ideas might apply to people receiving dialysis. It is the first step of a theory-driven explanatory realist synthesis and realist evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included a broad literature search and interviews with seven CBT therapists across Canada and the United States. Search terms were derived from CBT and refined to theory-based literature, literature reviews and book chapters. Therapists were recruited through team collaborators and had experience in developing or providing CBT to adults with depressive symptoms, including those receiving dialysis. Qualitative analysis of data from the literature and interviews focused on identifying mechanisms through which CBT is expected to reduce depressive symptoms in people receiving dialysis and the circumstances that may shape these mechanisms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on our findings from 30 documents and the interview data, individuals living with dialysis treatment and experiencing depressive symptoms may benefit from CBT through (1) cognitive changes related to their illness and self; (2) experiencing pleasant emotions; and (3) feeling seen, understood and accepted. However, people's capacity to engage with CBT may be limited due to significant illness and treatment burdens, as well as the perceived stigma of mental health issues. Our findings can be explained by the cognitive behavioural model, illness adjustment theories such as the common-sense model of self-regulation, response shift theory, client-centred therapy, and the cumulative complexity model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study contributes to knowledge by explaining how the illness context of dialysis treatment might shape the mechanisms through which CBT is expected to work. Understanding the dialysis illness context when developing psychosocial interventions such as CBT can advance the provision of person-centred mental health kidney care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>This patient-oriented research leveraged established partnerships including a Community Advisory Committee, an equity, diversity, inclusivity (EDI) champion, industry partner, kidney administrators and clinicians, and CBT experts. The Community Advisory includes 10 people who have met monthly for over 10 years; the Committee itself is co-chaired by a person with lived experience. The Community Advisors collaborated on the original study idea, participated in grant proposal development, gave feedback on ethics applications and study design, provided input on the initial programme theory, and co-presented at provincial Nephrology Grand Rounds and Research days. They continue to lead in the next phases of this project.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70466","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Depressive symptoms remain inadequately addressed and undertreated in people who receive life-prolonging dialysis treatment. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective for treating depression; however, we lack an understanding of how and under what circumstances people with depressive symptoms receiving dialysis may benefit from it. The aim of this study is to identify ideas underlying CBT in general and develop an initial programme theory that explains how these ideas might apply to people receiving dialysis. It is the first step of a theory-driven explanatory realist synthesis and realist evaluation.

Methods

This study included a broad literature search and interviews with seven CBT therapists across Canada and the United States. Search terms were derived from CBT and refined to theory-based literature, literature reviews and book chapters. Therapists were recruited through team collaborators and had experience in developing or providing CBT to adults with depressive symptoms, including those receiving dialysis. Qualitative analysis of data from the literature and interviews focused on identifying mechanisms through which CBT is expected to reduce depressive symptoms in people receiving dialysis and the circumstances that may shape these mechanisms.

Results

Based on our findings from 30 documents and the interview data, individuals living with dialysis treatment and experiencing depressive symptoms may benefit from CBT through (1) cognitive changes related to their illness and self; (2) experiencing pleasant emotions; and (3) feeling seen, understood and accepted. However, people's capacity to engage with CBT may be limited due to significant illness and treatment burdens, as well as the perceived stigma of mental health issues. Our findings can be explained by the cognitive behavioural model, illness adjustment theories such as the common-sense model of self-regulation, response shift theory, client-centred therapy, and the cumulative complexity model.

Conclusion

This study contributes to knowledge by explaining how the illness context of dialysis treatment might shape the mechanisms through which CBT is expected to work. Understanding the dialysis illness context when developing psychosocial interventions such as CBT can advance the provision of person-centred mental health kidney care.

Patient or Public Contribution

This patient-oriented research leveraged established partnerships including a Community Advisory Committee, an equity, diversity, inclusivity (EDI) champion, industry partner, kidney administrators and clinicians, and CBT experts. The Community Advisory includes 10 people who have met monthly for over 10 years; the Committee itself is co-chaired by a person with lived experience. The Community Advisors collaborated on the original study idea, participated in grant proposal development, gave feedback on ethics applications and study design, provided input on the initial programme theory, and co-presented at provincial Nephrology Grand Rounds and Research days. They continue to lead in the next phases of this project.

Abstract Image

接受透析的人如何从认知行为疗法中受益?现实主义分析
在接受延长生命的透析治疗的人群中,抑郁症状仍然没有得到充分的解决和治疗。认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明对治疗抑郁症有效;然而,我们缺乏对如何以及在什么情况下接受透析的抑郁症状患者可能从中受益的理解。本研究的目的是确定CBT的基本思想,并发展一个初步的方案理论,解释这些思想如何适用于接受透析的人。这是理论驱动的解释性现实主义综合和现实主义评价的第一步。方法本研究包括广泛的文献检索和对加拿大和美国的7位CBT治疗师的访谈。搜索词来源于CBT,并被提炼为基于理论的文献、文献评论和书籍章节。治疗师是通过团队合作者招募的,他们在为有抑郁症状的成年人(包括接受透析的成年人)开发或提供CBT方面有经验。对来自文献和访谈的数据进行定性分析,重点是确定CBT有望减轻透析患者抑郁症状的机制,以及可能形成这些机制的环境。结果:基于30份文献和访谈数据,接受透析治疗并经历抑郁症状的个体可能从CBT中获益:(1)与他们的疾病和自我相关的认知改变;(2)体验愉悦的情绪;(3)感觉被看到、理解和接受。然而,由于严重的疾病和治疗负担,以及对心理健康问题的耻辱感,人们参与CBT的能力可能受到限制。我们的发现可以用认知行为模型、疾病适应理论(如自我调节的常识模型)、反应转移理论、以客户为中心的治疗和累积复杂性模型来解释。结论:本研究通过解释透析治疗的疾病背景如何塑造CBT预期工作的机制,有助于了解。在制定心理社会干预措施(如CBT)时,了解透析疾病背景可以促进以人为本的精神健康肾脏护理的提供。这项以患者为导向的研究利用了已建立的合作伙伴关系,包括社区咨询委员会、公平、多样性、包容性(EDI)倡导者、行业合作伙伴、肾脏管理人员和临床医生以及CBT专家。社区顾问包括10位每月见面超过10年的人;委员会本身由一位有实际经验的人担任联合主席。社区顾问就最初的研究想法进行了合作,参与了拨款提案的制定,对伦理申请和研究设计提供了反馈,为最初的计划理论提供了意见,并在省级肾脏病大查房和研究日上共同发表了演讲。他们将继续领导这个项目的下一个阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信