A cross-cultural investigation of the effects of individual privilege, group identification and societal perceptions on global consciousness

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sarah Y. Choi, Robert Jiqi Zhang, Evan Valdes, Tian Xie, I-Ching Lee, Angela K.-y. Leung, Michelle Lee, Mei-Hua Lin, Darrin Hodgetts, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Pablo Monares, Jinling You
{"title":"A cross-cultural investigation of the effects of individual privilege, group identification and societal perceptions on global consciousness","authors":"Sarah Y. Choi,&nbsp;Robert Jiqi Zhang,&nbsp;Evan Valdes,&nbsp;Tian Xie,&nbsp;I-Ching Lee,&nbsp;Angela K.-y. Leung,&nbsp;Michelle Lee,&nbsp;Mei-Hua Lin,&nbsp;Darrin Hodgetts,&nbsp;Sylvia Xiaohua Chen,&nbsp;Pablo Monares,&nbsp;Jinling You","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amidst growing polarization and nationalism across societies, global consciousness (GC) provides an important construct for addressing the political challenges of our era. GC is a holistic and complex psychological orientation constituted by the distinct components of awareness, identity and morality. The current studies investigated whether measures of individual privilege (income, education, subjective status, frequent travel and multilingual capacity), group identification (national, religious and political) and societal perceptions positively predict these distinct components of GC. This was examined across a cross-cultural sample including two global superpowers (China and the United States) and other Asian societies (Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan) that vary in their positioning toward globalization (<i>N</i> = 1449 in Study 1, <i>N</i> = 1615 in Study 2). The findings supported the replication tests of individual privilege as predictors of GC to varying extents across cultural contexts, while measures of identification with meaningful groups showed high cross-cultural consistency as predictors of GC and its underlying components. Finally, the studies found considerable cultural variation in the influence of societal perceptions on GC between the United States and China. The importance of building upon knowledge that incorporates cultural, contextual and geopolitical dynamics in our endeavour to understand and cultivate GC is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amidst growing polarization and nationalism across societies, global consciousness (GC) provides an important construct for addressing the political challenges of our era. GC is a holistic and complex psychological orientation constituted by the distinct components of awareness, identity and morality. The current studies investigated whether measures of individual privilege (income, education, subjective status, frequent travel and multilingual capacity), group identification (national, religious and political) and societal perceptions positively predict these distinct components of GC. This was examined across a cross-cultural sample including two global superpowers (China and the United States) and other Asian societies (Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan) that vary in their positioning toward globalization (N = 1449 in Study 1, N = 1615 in Study 2). The findings supported the replication tests of individual privilege as predictors of GC to varying extents across cultural contexts, while measures of identification with meaningful groups showed high cross-cultural consistency as predictors of GC and its underlying components. Finally, the studies found considerable cultural variation in the influence of societal perceptions on GC between the United States and China. The importance of building upon knowledge that incorporates cultural, contextual and geopolitical dynamics in our endeavour to understand and cultivate GC is discussed.

Abstract Image

个人特权、群体认同和社会观念对全球意识影响的跨文化研究
在社会两极分化和民族主义日益加剧的背景下,全球意识(GC)为解决我们这个时代的政治挑战提供了一个重要的构建。GC是一种由意识、身份和道德等不同成分构成的整体复杂的心理取向。目前的研究调查了个人特权(收入、教育、主观地位、频繁旅行和多语言能力)、群体认同(国家、宗教和政治)和社会观念是否能积极预测GC的这些不同组成部分。这是通过跨文化样本进行检验的,包括两个全球超级大国(中国和美国)和其他亚洲社会(香港、马来西亚、新加坡、台湾),这些社会对全球化的定位各不相同(研究1中N = 1449,研究2中N = 1615)。研究结果在不同的文化背景下支持了个人特权作为GC预测因子的重复性测试,而对有意义群体的识别度量显示了作为GC及其潜在成分预测因子的高跨文化一致性。最后,研究发现,在美国和中国之间,社会观念对GC的影响存在相当大的文化差异。讨论了在我们努力理解和培养GC的过程中,结合文化、语境和地缘政治动态的知识的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信