Rising Skill Premium, Education Funding, and Education Decision

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Joël Hellier
{"title":"Rising Skill Premium, Education Funding, and Education Decision","authors":"Joël Hellier","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper analyzes the effects of an increase in earnings inequality between skilled and unskilled workers (rising skill premium) on education decisions, intraskilled inequality, and intergenerational mobility, depending on the way higher education is funded. The rise in the skill premium encourages higher education enrollment. When higher education is costly for individuals or their families, a rising skill premium (i) improves the relative position of children from skilled families, (ii) reduces interskill intergenerational mobility, and (iii) fosters inequality across skilled workers (“intraskilled inequality”). The impact depends on education funding, and the only situation in which skilled families are not favored is when higher education is freely provided. In this case, the increase in university enrollment must come with an increase in public expenditure on higher education to prevent the deletion of the highest skills. These results are in line with the developments observed in the last four decades in advanced economies, where the constant increase in the skill premium has come with a general increase in the educational level of the population, which has been higher at the top of the skill ladder.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpet.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpet.70070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of an increase in earnings inequality between skilled and unskilled workers (rising skill premium) on education decisions, intraskilled inequality, and intergenerational mobility, depending on the way higher education is funded. The rise in the skill premium encourages higher education enrollment. When higher education is costly for individuals or their families, a rising skill premium (i) improves the relative position of children from skilled families, (ii) reduces interskill intergenerational mobility, and (iii) fosters inequality across skilled workers (“intraskilled inequality”). The impact depends on education funding, and the only situation in which skilled families are not favored is when higher education is freely provided. In this case, the increase in university enrollment must come with an increase in public expenditure on higher education to prevent the deletion of the highest skills. These results are in line with the developments observed in the last four decades in advanced economies, where the constant increase in the skill premium has come with a general increase in the educational level of the population, which has been higher at the top of the skill ladder.

Abstract Image

不断上升的技能溢价、教育资金和教育决策
本文分析了技术工人和非技术工人之间收入不平等的增加(技能溢价上升)对教育决策、技能内部不平等和代际流动性的影响,这取决于高等教育的资助方式。技能溢价的上升鼓励了高等教育的入学率。当高等教育对个人或其家庭来说成本高昂时,技能溢价的上升(1)提高了技术家庭子女的相对地位,(2)减少了技能间代际流动,(3)助长了技术工人之间的不平等(“技能内不平等”)。这种影响取决于教育资金,只有在高等教育免费提供的情况下,技术家庭才不会受到优待。在这种情况下,大学招生人数的增加必须伴随着高等教育公共支出的增加,以防止最高技能的流失。这些结果与发达经济体在过去四十年中观察到的发展相一致,在发达经济体中,随着人口教育水平的普遍提高,技能溢价不断增加,而在技能阶梯的顶端,教育水平更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
36.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Association of Public Economic Theory, Journal of Public Economic Theory (JPET) is dedicated to stimulating research in the rapidly growing field of public economics. Submissions are judged on the basis of their creativity and rigor, and the Journal imposes neither upper nor lower boundary on the complexity of the techniques employed. This journal focuses on such topics as public goods, local public goods, club economies, externalities, taxation, growth, public choice, social and public decision making, voting, market failure, regulation, project evaluation, equity, and political systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书