Improving the Function of Social Interaction: A Preliminary Evaluation of a Basic-Research-Informed Approach

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Pierce M. Taylor, Celeste M. Tevis, Samuel L. Morris
{"title":"Improving the Function of Social Interaction: A Preliminary Evaluation of a Basic-Research-Informed Approach","authors":"Pierce M. Taylor,&nbsp;Celeste M. Tevis,&nbsp;Samuel L. Morris","doi":"10.1002/bin.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>When social interactions do not function as efficacious reinforcers, it may impede learning in environments that rely on differential social consequences. Although researchers have evaluated methods of improving the function of social interaction, these methods are not always effective, perhaps because they are inconsistent with principles of Pavlovian conditioning. In the current study, we evaluated whether a basic-research-informed approach could increase the reinforcing efficacy of social interactions for two children with developmental disabilities. Specifically, we evaluated the effects of conditioning procedures that ensured large <i>C</i>/<i>t</i> ratios by using progressive ratio schedules to quantify changes in the reinforcing efficacy of play with and without social interaction. The <i>C</i>/<i>t</i> ratio represents the temporal contiguity between stimuli, where <i>C</i> is the average time between unconditioned stimulus (US) deliveries, and <i>t</i> is the average time between the neutral stimulus and US deliveries. Improvements in absolute and relative reinforcer efficacy of social interaction were obtained for both participants, suggesting that methods which ensure large <i>C</i>/<i>t</i> could result in more efficacious conditioning interventions. We discuss the need for further translational and applied research as well as potential clinical implications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When social interactions do not function as efficacious reinforcers, it may impede learning in environments that rely on differential social consequences. Although researchers have evaluated methods of improving the function of social interaction, these methods are not always effective, perhaps because they are inconsistent with principles of Pavlovian conditioning. In the current study, we evaluated whether a basic-research-informed approach could increase the reinforcing efficacy of social interactions for two children with developmental disabilities. Specifically, we evaluated the effects of conditioning procedures that ensured large C/t ratios by using progressive ratio schedules to quantify changes in the reinforcing efficacy of play with and without social interaction. The C/t ratio represents the temporal contiguity between stimuli, where C is the average time between unconditioned stimulus (US) deliveries, and t is the average time between the neutral stimulus and US deliveries. Improvements in absolute and relative reinforcer efficacy of social interaction were obtained for both participants, suggesting that methods which ensure large C/t could result in more efficacious conditioning interventions. We discuss the need for further translational and applied research as well as potential clinical implications.

提高社会互动功能:基础研究-知情方法的初步评价
当社会互动不能作为有效的强化因素发挥作用时,它可能会阻碍在依赖不同社会后果的环境中学习。尽管研究人员已经评估了改善社会互动功能的方法,但这些方法并不总是有效的,也许是因为它们与巴甫洛夫条件反射的原则不一致。在本研究中,我们评估了一种基于基础研究的方法是否可以提高两名发育障碍儿童的社会互动强化效果。具体来说,我们通过使用渐进式比率表来量化有社会互动和没有社会互动的游戏强化效果的变化,评估了确保大C/t比率的条件反射程序的效果。C/t比率代表刺激之间的时间连续性,其中C是非条件刺激(US)交付之间的平均时间,t是中性刺激和US交付之间的平均时间。社会互动的绝对强化物效能和相对强化物效能均有改善,这表明确保大C/t的方法可能导致更有效的条件反射干预。我们讨论了进一步的转化和应用研究的需要以及潜在的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书