Shixiong Du , Huaiwei Sun , Baowei Yan , Changmei Liang , Deliang Chen , Xiaoya Deng , Jie Xue , Haichen Li , Wenxin Zhang
{"title":"China's electricity transmission reduces carbon emissions but causes water resource depletion","authors":"Shixiong Du , Huaiwei Sun , Baowei Yan , Changmei Liang , Deliang Chen , Xiaoya Deng , Jie Xue , Haichen Li , Wenxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's rapid growth in electricity demand intensifies the twin challenges of water conservation and carbon reduction in a system where production and consumption are spatially mismatched. We develop a novel evaluation framework to quantify how electricity generation and interprovincial transmission redistribute “virtual” water and carbon. The method integrates national water/carbon footprints by technology with a dimensionless provincial resource stress index (SI) that scales footprints to local resource conditions, and couples these with observed electricity flows among 30 provinces (2010, 2015, 2020). We further apply Kaya–LMDI decomposition to attribute changes to average water/carbon intensity, generation efficiency, industrial progressiveness, economic level, and population. Our results show electricity generation and supply concentrated in northern, eastern, and southwestern China, with northern provinces dominated by thermal power and southern provinces by hydropower. In 2020, interprovincial transfers embodied 7.8 billion m<sup>3</sup> of virtual water and 758.6 Mt of virtual carbon. Transmission supported national decarbonization by increasing carbon-reduction benefits from 63.6 Mt (2010) to 164.0 Mt (2020), but also increased pressure on water resources, with water depletion rising from 1.2 to 1.9 billion m<sup>3</sup>. A significant negative correlation between water-conservation and carbon-reduction benefits indicates a persistent trade-off, although its strength weakened over time as provincial mixes diversified. The scenario analysis suggests that province-specific, “balanced” adjustments to the electricity mix can deliver larger joint gains than single-objective (water- or carbon-prioritized) strategies. Overall, our study provides policy implications, including optimizing interprovincial trading patterns, differentiating targets by regional resource endowments, and adopting shared-responsibility mechanisms and compensation instruments for exporting regions. The proposed assessment framework also provides a scalable basis for aligning electricity planning with SDGs and China's carbon-neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 138764"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225044068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China's rapid growth in electricity demand intensifies the twin challenges of water conservation and carbon reduction in a system where production and consumption are spatially mismatched. We develop a novel evaluation framework to quantify how electricity generation and interprovincial transmission redistribute “virtual” water and carbon. The method integrates national water/carbon footprints by technology with a dimensionless provincial resource stress index (SI) that scales footprints to local resource conditions, and couples these with observed electricity flows among 30 provinces (2010, 2015, 2020). We further apply Kaya–LMDI decomposition to attribute changes to average water/carbon intensity, generation efficiency, industrial progressiveness, economic level, and population. Our results show electricity generation and supply concentrated in northern, eastern, and southwestern China, with northern provinces dominated by thermal power and southern provinces by hydropower. In 2020, interprovincial transfers embodied 7.8 billion m3 of virtual water and 758.6 Mt of virtual carbon. Transmission supported national decarbonization by increasing carbon-reduction benefits from 63.6 Mt (2010) to 164.0 Mt (2020), but also increased pressure on water resources, with water depletion rising from 1.2 to 1.9 billion m3. A significant negative correlation between water-conservation and carbon-reduction benefits indicates a persistent trade-off, although its strength weakened over time as provincial mixes diversified. The scenario analysis suggests that province-specific, “balanced” adjustments to the electricity mix can deliver larger joint gains than single-objective (water- or carbon-prioritized) strategies. Overall, our study provides policy implications, including optimizing interprovincial trading patterns, differentiating targets by regional resource endowments, and adopting shared-responsibility mechanisms and compensation instruments for exporting regions. The proposed assessment framework also provides a scalable basis for aligning electricity planning with SDGs and China's carbon-neutrality goals.
期刊介绍:
Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics.
The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management.
Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.