Safe reinforcement learning-based energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric aircraft with longevity considerations

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yajing Xiao , Jinning Zhang , Harold S. Ruiz , Ioannis Roumeliotis , Xin Zhang
{"title":"Safe reinforcement learning-based energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric aircraft with longevity considerations","authors":"Yajing Xiao ,&nbsp;Jinning Zhang ,&nbsp;Harold S. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Ioannis Roumeliotis ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Aircraft (FCHEA) represent a promising solution for decarbonizing short-to medium-range aviation. However, the hybrid-electric architecture introduces increased control complexity and poses challenges in ensuring component longevity and operational safety. Although reinforcement learning (RL)-based energy management strategies (EMS) have been explored in ground vehicle application, they often prioritize fuel efficiency while neglecting component degradation and safety-critical constraints, both of which are vital for the reliability of electric aviation. This study presents a Longevity-Conscious Safe Energy Management Strategy (LC-SEMS) to minimize operational and degradation-related costs over long-term use, while ensuring the satisfaction of multi-type constraint. The strategy is implemented within a multidisciplinary simulation framework that integrates propulsion, aerodynamics, hybrid powertrain, and flight dynamics models for mission-level evaluation. The EMS problem is formulated as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) incorporating physical, cumulative, and instantaneous constraints. Instantaneous safety is enforced via an adaptive shielding mechanism that leverages a pretrained transition model to detect potential constraint violations and applies minimal corrective actions without interfering with policy learning. The proposed strategy is validated on a simulated FCHEA retrofitted from the NASA X-57 Maxwell, achieving fast convergence and strict constraint adherence across multi-mission scenarios. It achieves a 26.96 % reduction in depreciation cost compared to baseline RL-based EMS, with a minimal 4.21 % performance gap relative to the globally optimal Dynamic Programming (DP) benchmark, demonstrating its adaptability and robustness under uncertain and unseen mission scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 138782"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422504424X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Aircraft (FCHEA) represent a promising solution for decarbonizing short-to medium-range aviation. However, the hybrid-electric architecture introduces increased control complexity and poses challenges in ensuring component longevity and operational safety. Although reinforcement learning (RL)-based energy management strategies (EMS) have been explored in ground vehicle application, they often prioritize fuel efficiency while neglecting component degradation and safety-critical constraints, both of which are vital for the reliability of electric aviation. This study presents a Longevity-Conscious Safe Energy Management Strategy (LC-SEMS) to minimize operational and degradation-related costs over long-term use, while ensuring the satisfaction of multi-type constraint. The strategy is implemented within a multidisciplinary simulation framework that integrates propulsion, aerodynamics, hybrid powertrain, and flight dynamics models for mission-level evaluation. The EMS problem is formulated as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) incorporating physical, cumulative, and instantaneous constraints. Instantaneous safety is enforced via an adaptive shielding mechanism that leverages a pretrained transition model to detect potential constraint violations and applies minimal corrective actions without interfering with policy learning. The proposed strategy is validated on a simulated FCHEA retrofitted from the NASA X-57 Maxwell, achieving fast convergence and strict constraint adherence across multi-mission scenarios. It achieves a 26.96 % reduction in depreciation cost compared to baseline RL-based EMS, with a minimal 4.21 % performance gap relative to the globally optimal Dynamic Programming (DP) benchmark, demonstrating its adaptability and robustness under uncertain and unseen mission scenarios.
考虑寿命的燃料电池混合动力飞机安全强化学习能量管理
燃料电池混合动力飞机(FCHEA)代表了中短程航空脱碳的一个有前途的解决方案。然而,混合动力架构增加了控制复杂性,并在确保组件寿命和运行安全方面提出了挑战。尽管基于强化学习(RL)的能量管理策略(EMS)已经在地面车辆应用中进行了探索,但它们往往优先考虑燃油效率,而忽略了组件退化和安全关键约束,这两者对于电动航空的可靠性至关重要。本研究提出了一种长寿意识安全能源管理策略(LC-SEMS),以最大限度地降低长期使用过程中的运行和降解相关成本,同时确保满足多种约束条件。该策略在多学科仿真框架内实施,该框架集成了推进、空气动力学、混合动力系统和飞行动力学模型,用于任务级评估。EMS问题被表述为包含物理、累积和瞬时约束的约束马尔可夫决策过程(CMDP)。瞬时安全性通过自适应屏蔽机制实现,该机制利用预训练的过渡模型来检测潜在的约束违规,并在不干扰策略学习的情况下应用最小的纠正措施。提出的策略在NASA X-57 Maxwell改装的模拟FCHEA上进行了验证,实现了跨多任务场景的快速收敛和严格约束遵守。与基于rl的基线EMS相比,它的折旧成本降低了26.96%,与全局最优动态规划(DP)基准相比,其性能差距最小为4.21%,证明了其在不确定和不可见任务场景下的适应性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信