Optimizing carbon reduction technologies portfolios of buildings: Lifecycle approach based individual and system technology readiness level assessments

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Shaoqin Xue , Yinshan Liu , Boqun Zhang , Xiaohui Guo , Qianqian Zhang , Chengcheng Shi , Lei Fan , Liping Wang , Xinlei Chang , Yuanfeng Wang
{"title":"Optimizing carbon reduction technologies portfolios of buildings: Lifecycle approach based individual and system technology readiness level assessments","authors":"Shaoqin Xue ,&nbsp;Yinshan Liu ,&nbsp;Boqun Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Guo ,&nbsp;Qianqian Zhang ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Shi ,&nbsp;Lei Fan ,&nbsp;Liping Wang ,&nbsp;Xinlei Chang ,&nbsp;Yuanfeng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The building sector contributes significantly to global carbon emissions. Despite the development of various carbon reduction technologies (CRTs), challenges persist in assessing their maturity and effectively selecting technology combinations for emissions reduction. To address this issue, this study constructed a list of building CRTs covering 19 technologies for a Chinese case building, and established a quantitative assessment method for the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) rating of building CRTs. Furthermore, This study developed a System Readiness Level (SRL) evaluation model based on TRL and Integration Readiness Level (IRL), and proposed an optimization model for carbon reduction technology combinations using SRL as a key constraint. The NSGA-III algorithm was utilized to solve for the optimal technology combination of the case study building, aiming to maximize building carbon reduction while satisfying constraints on technology combinations and system maturity. The results show that the SRL of the optimal carbon reduction scheme for the case building is 0.701, in which the CRTs of high level TRL account for more than 54 % of the technology combination, indicating that the scheme has high reliability and operability in practical engineering applications. Meanwhile, the carbon reduction rate of the program reaches 93.91 %, of which the carbon reduction contribution of renewable energy technologies is as high as 47.01 %. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework for selecting scalable and effective CRT portfolios, contributing to whole-life-cycle carbon reduction in buildings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 138832"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225044743","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The building sector contributes significantly to global carbon emissions. Despite the development of various carbon reduction technologies (CRTs), challenges persist in assessing their maturity and effectively selecting technology combinations for emissions reduction. To address this issue, this study constructed a list of building CRTs covering 19 technologies for a Chinese case building, and established a quantitative assessment method for the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) rating of building CRTs. Furthermore, This study developed a System Readiness Level (SRL) evaluation model based on TRL and Integration Readiness Level (IRL), and proposed an optimization model for carbon reduction technology combinations using SRL as a key constraint. The NSGA-III algorithm was utilized to solve for the optimal technology combination of the case study building, aiming to maximize building carbon reduction while satisfying constraints on technology combinations and system maturity. The results show that the SRL of the optimal carbon reduction scheme for the case building is 0.701, in which the CRTs of high level TRL account for more than 54 % of the technology combination, indicating that the scheme has high reliability and operability in practical engineering applications. Meanwhile, the carbon reduction rate of the program reaches 93.91 %, of which the carbon reduction contribution of renewable energy technologies is as high as 47.01 %. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework for selecting scalable and effective CRT portfolios, contributing to whole-life-cycle carbon reduction in buildings.

Abstract Image

优化建筑的碳减排技术组合:基于个人和系统技术准备水平评估的生命周期方法
建筑行业对全球碳排放的贡献很大。尽管各种碳减排技术(crt)得到了发展,但在评估其成熟度和有效选择减排技术组合方面仍然存在挑战。为解决这一问题,本研究构建了中国案例建筑的19种技术的建筑crt清单,并建立了建筑crt技术成熟度(TRL)评级的定量评估方法。在此基础上,建立了基于TRL和集成准备水平(IRL)的系统准备水平(SRL)评价模型,并提出了以系统准备水平为关键约束的碳减排技术组合优化模型。利用NSGA-III算法求解案例建筑的最优技术组合,在满足技术组合约束和系统成熟度约束的前提下,实现建筑碳减排最大化。结果表明,案例建筑最优减碳方案的SRL为0.701,其中高水平TRL的crt占技术组合的54%以上,表明该方案在实际工程应用中具有较高的可靠性和可操作性。同时,项目碳减排率达到93.91%,其中可再生能源技术的碳减排贡献高达47.01%。所提出的方法为选择可扩展和有效的CRT组合提供了一个强大的框架,有助于建筑物全生命周期的碳减排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信