Psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 in daily surveys: An item response theory and longitudinal measurement invariance analysis
Brett A. Messman , Siyuan Wang , Prathiba Batley , Nicole H. Weiss , Jennifer A. Newberry , Ateka A. Contractor
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 in daily surveys: An item response theory and longitudinal measurement invariance analysis","authors":"Brett A. Messman , Siyuan Wang , Prathiba Batley , Nicole H. Weiss , Jennifer A. Newberry , Ateka A. Contractor","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) has demonstrated excellent psychometric qualities across cross-sectional studies, yet the scale’s performance in intensive longitudinal studies is less known. Using data from the PCL-5 administered daily for 9 days, we (a) conducted item analysis of the PCL-5 using the graded response model to examine item characteristics (thresholds and discrimination parameters) and (b) examined differential item functioning (DIF) to evaluate whether the PCL-5 measured the PTSD latent trait identically across daily surveys (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Methodologically, 256 trauma-exposed university students (<em>M</em>age = 21.01 ± 4.24; 85.8 % women; 41.0 % probable PTSD) completed the 20-item PCL-5 for 9 consecutive days. Across days, results indicated lower but acceptable discrimination for PCL-5 items 8 (traumatic amnesia), 16 (reckless or self-destructive behaviors), and 17 (hypervigilance). Further, 14 % of participants exhibited person misfit at least once across the 9 days. DIF analysis indicated that Item 2 (nightmares) exhibited DIF across days indicating potential bias; however, the effect sizes for DIF were negligible. In conclusion, the results broadly provide psychometric support for using the 20-item PCL-5 in intensive longitudinal studies. Future replication of study results across diverse and clinical populations could help to further strengthen these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852500115X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) has demonstrated excellent psychometric qualities across cross-sectional studies, yet the scale’s performance in intensive longitudinal studies is less known. Using data from the PCL-5 administered daily for 9 days, we (a) conducted item analysis of the PCL-5 using the graded response model to examine item characteristics (thresholds and discrimination parameters) and (b) examined differential item functioning (DIF) to evaluate whether the PCL-5 measured the PTSD latent trait identically across daily surveys (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Methodologically, 256 trauma-exposed university students (Mage = 21.01 ± 4.24; 85.8 % women; 41.0 % probable PTSD) completed the 20-item PCL-5 for 9 consecutive days. Across days, results indicated lower but acceptable discrimination for PCL-5 items 8 (traumatic amnesia), 16 (reckless or self-destructive behaviors), and 17 (hypervigilance). Further, 14 % of participants exhibited person misfit at least once across the 9 days. DIF analysis indicated that Item 2 (nightmares) exhibited DIF across days indicating potential bias; however, the effect sizes for DIF were negligible. In conclusion, the results broadly provide psychometric support for using the 20-item PCL-5 in intensive longitudinal studies. Future replication of study results across diverse and clinical populations could help to further strengthen these findings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.