The social lives of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A qualitative study of vaccine understandings and decision-making among people of Black ethnicities in London, UK

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Emily Jay Nicholls , Denis Onyango , Vladimir Kolodin , Zoë Ottaway , Abi Carter , Lucy Campbell , Frank Post , Shema Tariq
{"title":"The social lives of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A qualitative study of vaccine understandings and decision-making among people of Black ethnicities in London, UK","authors":"Emily Jay Nicholls ,&nbsp;Denis Onyango ,&nbsp;Vladimir Kolodin ,&nbsp;Zoë Ottaway ,&nbsp;Abi Carter ,&nbsp;Lucy Campbell ,&nbsp;Frank Post ,&nbsp;Shema Tariq","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, people of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicities were among the groups most likely to acquire COVID-19, and to develop serious infection, but were also the least likely to have received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our aim was to explore SARS-CoV-2 vaccine understandings and decision-making among people of Black ethnicities in order to understand the complex drivers of vaccination disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted six online and face-to-face focus group discussions with thirty-six participants of Black ethnicities in London, UK. Topic guides were developed with our community partners and covered impact on daily lives, experiences of COVID-19, knowledge and beliefs (including about prevention measures), and healthcare seeking behaviour and perceptions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants described how their relationships with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were entangled with their belonging to religious communities; how painful histories of medical experimentation on Black people had reemerged in the context of concerns regarding vaccine safety; and how present realities of medical racism and global vaccine inequity shaped their understandings of the vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our account problematises “vaccine hesitancy” and the hegemonic belief that this is a direct consequence of a lack of knowledge or education. Instead, by engaging with “social lives” of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccines, we trace the rich meanings ascribed to vaccination, and complex and active negotiations around vaccination, among participants. Public health practitioners and policymakers should move beyond conceptualising vaccine hesitancy as irrational or ill informed, and instead acknowledge how such decisions are situated within a wider social, historical and political landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 127802"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25010990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, people of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicities were among the groups most likely to acquire COVID-19, and to develop serious infection, but were also the least likely to have received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our aim was to explore SARS-CoV-2 vaccine understandings and decision-making among people of Black ethnicities in order to understand the complex drivers of vaccination disparities.

Methods

We conducted six online and face-to-face focus group discussions with thirty-six participants of Black ethnicities in London, UK. Topic guides were developed with our community partners and covered impact on daily lives, experiences of COVID-19, knowledge and beliefs (including about prevention measures), and healthcare seeking behaviour and perceptions.

Results

Participants described how their relationships with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were entangled with their belonging to religious communities; how painful histories of medical experimentation on Black people had reemerged in the context of concerns regarding vaccine safety; and how present realities of medical racism and global vaccine inequity shaped their understandings of the vaccines.

Conclusion

Our account problematises “vaccine hesitancy” and the hegemonic belief that this is a direct consequence of a lack of knowledge or education. Instead, by engaging with “social lives” of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccines, we trace the rich meanings ascribed to vaccination, and complex and active negotiations around vaccination, among participants. Public health practitioners and policymakers should move beyond conceptualising vaccine hesitancy as irrational or ill informed, and instead acknowledge how such decisions are situated within a wider social, historical and political landscape.
SARS-CoV-2疫苗的社会生活:英国伦敦黑人对疫苗理解和决策的定性研究
在COVID-19大流行的头两年,非洲黑人和加勒比黑人是最容易感染COVID-19并发生严重感染的群体之一,但也是最不可能接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗的群体。我们的目的是探讨黑人对SARS-CoV-2疫苗的理解和决策,以了解疫苗接种差异的复杂驱动因素。方法我们在英国伦敦对36名黑人进行了6次在线和面对面的焦点小组讨论。我们与社区合作伙伴共同制定了主题指南,涵盖了对日常生活的影响、COVID-19的经历、知识和信念(包括有关预防措施的知识和信念)以及寻求医疗保健的行为和观念。结果参与者描述了他们与SARS-CoV-2疫苗的关系如何与他们属于宗教团体纠缠在一起;在对疫苗安全的担忧背景下,黑人医学实验的痛苦历史是如何重新出现的;以及当前医疗种族主义和全球疫苗不平等的现实如何影响他们对疫苗的理解。结论:我们的报告提出了“疫苗犹豫”的问题,以及认为这是缺乏知识或教育的直接后果的霸权信念。相反,通过参与SARS-Cov-2疫苗的“社会生活”,我们追溯了疫苗接种的丰富含义,以及参与者之间围绕疫苗接种进行的复杂而积极的谈判。公共卫生从业人员和政策制定者应该超越将疫苗犹豫概念化为不合理或不了解情况,而是承认这种决定是如何在更广泛的社会、历史和政治背景下作出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信