Interpretation of GSR evidence at activity level: Feasible or impossible?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Emmanuelle Charlot, Corina Kukurin, Cornelis J.M. van der Ham, Amalía Stamouli
{"title":"Interpretation of GSR evidence at activity level: Feasible or impossible?","authors":"Emmanuelle Charlot,&nbsp;Corina Kukurin,&nbsp;Cornelis J.M. van der Ham,&nbsp;Amalía Stamouli","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpretation methods for forensic evidence have been an area of great interest within the forensic community for decades, with a more recent focus on activity level methods of interpretation. The fundamentals of evaluative reporting and research papers addressing frameworks for probabilistic modeling of gunshot residue (GSR) evidence as well as variables influencing GSR interpretation, such as transfer and contamination, are summarized in this review. The implications and challenges associated with the projected shift to non-traditional (NT) ammunition are also explored. This narrative/scoping review aims to provide an overview of the current state of activity level interpretation of GSR evidence and identify priorities for focus in future research. Although of high probative value, activity level interpretation of gunshot residue evidence has been applied to a limited extent in casework due to challenges inherent to this type of evidence and probabilistic modeling. The imminent transition to NT ammunition within the European Union will require a significant reimagination of GSR analysis and interpretation. While much work still needs to be undertaken before activity level interpretation of GSR can be routinely implemented in forensic casework, the groundwork has been laid out in the literature reviewed and this review can serve as a point of reference in establishing a standardized practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 112682"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825003263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretation methods for forensic evidence have been an area of great interest within the forensic community for decades, with a more recent focus on activity level methods of interpretation. The fundamentals of evaluative reporting and research papers addressing frameworks for probabilistic modeling of gunshot residue (GSR) evidence as well as variables influencing GSR interpretation, such as transfer and contamination, are summarized in this review. The implications and challenges associated with the projected shift to non-traditional (NT) ammunition are also explored. This narrative/scoping review aims to provide an overview of the current state of activity level interpretation of GSR evidence and identify priorities for focus in future research. Although of high probative value, activity level interpretation of gunshot residue evidence has been applied to a limited extent in casework due to challenges inherent to this type of evidence and probabilistic modeling. The imminent transition to NT ammunition within the European Union will require a significant reimagination of GSR analysis and interpretation. While much work still needs to be undertaken before activity level interpretation of GSR can be routinely implemented in forensic casework, the groundwork has been laid out in the literature reviewed and this review can serve as a point of reference in establishing a standardized practice.

Abstract Image

在活动水平解释GSR证据:可行还是不可能?
几十年来,法医证据的解释方法一直是法医界非常感兴趣的领域,最近的重点是活动水平的解释方法。本文总结了评估报告和研究论文的基本原理,这些论文涉及枪击残留物(GSR)证据的概率建模框架以及影响GSR解释的变量,如转移和污染。还探讨了与预计转向非传统(NT)弹药有关的影响和挑战。本综述旨在概述GSR证据的活动水平解释的现状,并确定未来研究的重点。尽管具有很高的证明价值,但由于此类证据和概率建模固有的挑战,活动水平解释在案件工作中的应用范围有限。欧盟内部即将过渡到NT弹药将需要对GSR分析和解释进行重大的重新想象。虽然在法医案件工作中常规实施GSR的活动水平解释之前还有很多工作要做,但文献综述已经奠定了基础,本综述可以作为建立标准化实践的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信