Conservative treatment remains the most preferred approach for proximal humeral fractures in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians: A retrospective study from Turkish national database

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yavuz Şahbat , Merve Güner , Naim Ata , Şuayıp Birinci , Rıfat Bozkuş , Salih Başer , Nuri Aydın , Barış Kocaoğlu
{"title":"Conservative treatment remains the most preferred approach for proximal humeral fractures in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians: A retrospective study from Turkish national database","authors":"Yavuz Şahbat ,&nbsp;Merve Güner ,&nbsp;Naim Ata ,&nbsp;Şuayıp Birinci ,&nbsp;Rıfat Bozkuş ,&nbsp;Salih Başer ,&nbsp;Nuri Aydın ,&nbsp;Barış Kocaoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The treatment options of orthopedic surgeons for older adults with proximal humeral fractures (PHF) may vary according to chronological age. This study aimed to present the treatment modalities, complications, and mortality rates after PHF in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians from the Turkish national database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study was conducted using health records from the National Health Record System of Ministry of Health Turkey for individuals aged 80 and over who presented to public, private, and university hospitals from January 2016, to October 2024. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) code S42.2 (code for closed PHFs) was used to identify patients. A total of 9799 patients were included and categorized into three age groups: octogenarians (80–89 years), nonagenarians (90–99 years), and centenarians (≥100 years) and 4 groups according to treatment modalities (conservative, osteosynthesis, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and hemiarthroplasty). Early systemic complications, revision surgery and mortality rates regarding 30-day and 90-day were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of the study population was 85.1 ± 4.2, ranging between 80–106 years. The female ratio was 76.1 %. Octogenarians comprised 84.3 % of the entire study population, whereas 15.5 % were nonagenarians and 0.3 % were centenarians. Conservative treatment was the most preferred across all age groups (62.3 %). Among patients initially managed conservatively, 7.0 % (<em>n</em> = 425) subsequently required surgical intervention, with no statistically significant difference in surgical conversion rates across the three age groups. Only 77 patients (0.8 %) underwent RSA. No differences were observed in the ratio of early systemic complications between octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 4.9 % and 10.2 %, respectively. RSA was associated with the highest risk of 90-day mortality (HR: 2.222, 95 % CI: 1.328–3.718; <em>p</em> = 0.002), with centenarians exhibiting an even greater risk (HR: 2.879, 95 % CI: 1.193–6.949; <em>p</em> = 0.019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Conservative treatment remains the most preferred approach for PHFs in the patient population over the age of 80. Given the significantly higher mortality rates in centenarians and in patients undergoing RSA, individualized treatment decisions should prioritize functional outcomes, patient comorbidities, and life expectancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 12","pages":"Article 112785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325006436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The treatment options of orthopedic surgeons for older adults with proximal humeral fractures (PHF) may vary according to chronological age. This study aimed to present the treatment modalities, complications, and mortality rates after PHF in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians from the Turkish national database.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted using health records from the National Health Record System of Ministry of Health Turkey for individuals aged 80 and over who presented to public, private, and university hospitals from January 2016, to October 2024. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) code S42.2 (code for closed PHFs) was used to identify patients. A total of 9799 patients were included and categorized into three age groups: octogenarians (80–89 years), nonagenarians (90–99 years), and centenarians (≥100 years) and 4 groups according to treatment modalities (conservative, osteosynthesis, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and hemiarthroplasty). Early systemic complications, revision surgery and mortality rates regarding 30-day and 90-day were recorded.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 85.1 ± 4.2, ranging between 80–106 years. The female ratio was 76.1 %. Octogenarians comprised 84.3 % of the entire study population, whereas 15.5 % were nonagenarians and 0.3 % were centenarians. Conservative treatment was the most preferred across all age groups (62.3 %). Among patients initially managed conservatively, 7.0 % (n = 425) subsequently required surgical intervention, with no statistically significant difference in surgical conversion rates across the three age groups. Only 77 patients (0.8 %) underwent RSA. No differences were observed in the ratio of early systemic complications between octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 4.9 % and 10.2 %, respectively. RSA was associated with the highest risk of 90-day mortality (HR: 2.222, 95 % CI: 1.328–3.718; p = 0.002), with centenarians exhibiting an even greater risk (HR: 2.879, 95 % CI: 1.193–6.949; p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Conservative treatment remains the most preferred approach for PHFs in the patient population over the age of 80. Given the significantly higher mortality rates in centenarians and in patients undergoing RSA, individualized treatment decisions should prioritize functional outcomes, patient comorbidities, and life expectancy.
保守治疗仍然是80岁、90岁和百岁老人肱骨近端骨折的首选方法:一项来自土耳其国家数据库的回顾性研究
老年人肱骨近端骨折(PHF)骨科医生的治疗选择可能会根据实际年龄而有所不同。本研究旨在介绍来自土耳其国家数据库的80多岁、90多岁和百岁老人PHF的治疗方式、并发症和死亡率。方法本回顾性研究使用土耳其卫生部国家健康记录系统的健康记录,研究对象为2016年1月至2024年10月期间在公立、私立和大学医院就诊的80岁及以上患者。使用《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类》(ICD-10)代码S42.2(封闭phf代码)识别患者。共纳入9799例患者,分为80-89岁、90-99岁、百岁(≥100岁)3组,根据治疗方式(保守、骨融合术、反向肩关节置换术、半关节置换术)分为4组。记录30天和90天的早期全身性并发症、翻修手术和死亡率。结果研究人群平均年龄为85.1±4.2岁,年龄在80 ~ 106岁之间。女性比例为76.1%。80多岁老人占整个研究人群的84.3%,而15.5%是90多岁老人,0.3%是百岁老人。保守治疗在所有年龄组中最受欢迎(62.3%)。在最初保守治疗的患者中,7.0% (n = 425)随后需要手术干预,三个年龄组的手术转换率无统计学差异。只有77例(0.8%)患者接受了RSA。在80岁、90岁和百岁老人之间,早期系统性并发症的比例没有差异。30天和90天的死亡率分别为4.9%和10.2%。RSA与90天死亡风险最高相关(HR: 2.222, 95% CI: 1.328-3.718; p = 0.002),百岁老人表现出更大的风险(HR: 2.879, 95% CI: 1.193-6.949; p = 0.019)。结论保守治疗仍是80岁以上PHFs患者的首选治疗方法。考虑到百岁老人和RSA患者的死亡率明显较高,个体化治疗决策应优先考虑功能结局、患者合并症和预期寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信