{"title":"Effectiveness of waterproofing methods and commercial chemicals against carbonation and transport properties after carbonation","authors":"Lav Singh, Lupesh Dudi, Shashank Bishnoi","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With growing interest in low-clinker binders and the need to protect structures from water-induced degradation, assessing the performance of waterproofing chemicals under naturally carbonating conditions is essential. This study evaluates twelve commercial products across three waterproofing strategies: integral admixtures, hydrophobic impregnations, and surface coatings, applied to mortars made with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and four low-clinker binder blends (fly ash, slag, limestone, and calcined clay). After accelerated carbonation, treated and control specimens were tested for water absorption and oxygen permeability, two parameters critical to corrosion in carbonated environments. Results show that crystalline admixtures and hydrophobic impregnations effectively reduced carbonation depth and moisture transport, particularly at lower w/b ratios. Additionally, integral hydrophobic treatments enhanced water absorption resistance but simultaneously increased oxygen permeability relative to the control. In contrast, the crystalline cementitious coatings were largely ineffective, offering little resistance to carbonation and even raising oxygen permeability. Overall, while most treatments in low-clinker systems could not outperform control OPC in carbonation resistance (except one hydrophobic impregnation), several significantly lowered moisture transport to levels below OPC, highlighting their potential for durability enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 114293"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225025306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With growing interest in low-clinker binders and the need to protect structures from water-induced degradation, assessing the performance of waterproofing chemicals under naturally carbonating conditions is essential. This study evaluates twelve commercial products across three waterproofing strategies: integral admixtures, hydrophobic impregnations, and surface coatings, applied to mortars made with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and four low-clinker binder blends (fly ash, slag, limestone, and calcined clay). After accelerated carbonation, treated and control specimens were tested for water absorption and oxygen permeability, two parameters critical to corrosion in carbonated environments. Results show that crystalline admixtures and hydrophobic impregnations effectively reduced carbonation depth and moisture transport, particularly at lower w/b ratios. Additionally, integral hydrophobic treatments enhanced water absorption resistance but simultaneously increased oxygen permeability relative to the control. In contrast, the crystalline cementitious coatings were largely ineffective, offering little resistance to carbonation and even raising oxygen permeability. Overall, while most treatments in low-clinker systems could not outperform control OPC in carbonation resistance (except one hydrophobic impregnation), several significantly lowered moisture transport to levels below OPC, highlighting their potential for durability enhancement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.