‘This is the best place!’ A qualitative study of shopping centres as third places

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Gry Rustad Pettersen , Emma C.A. Nordbø , Kariann Krohne , Camilla Ihlebæk
{"title":"‘This is the best place!’ A qualitative study of shopping centres as third places","authors":"Gry Rustad Pettersen ,&nbsp;Emma C.A. Nordbø ,&nbsp;Kariann Krohne ,&nbsp;Camilla Ihlebæk","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vital urban environments contain a variety of places for social interaction. Shopping centres (SCs) form part of this social infrastructure and are widely used for everyday sociability. Yet limited knowledge exists on how individuals experience SCs as social arenas and how these spaces function as third places. To address this gap, the study drew on go-along interviews with fourteen men and women in a Norwegian SC. Four key themes emerged from the analysis. The first theme captured participants' appreciation of the SC and their habitual belonging to its physical environment and local community. Second, participants valued being among others, finding it fulfilling to be in the SC's vibrant environment even without verbal interaction. Third, participants engaged in casual encounters, typically brief and light-hearted exchanges. Finally, participants developed closer relationships, describing friendships they valued even when these seldom extended beyond the SC or involved sharing personal information. The findings highlight that the informal character of SCs provides neutral and accessible settings for diverse forms of social contact. The study also underscores the role of SCs as inclusive third places that accommodate both routinised and unstructured social interactions, thereby supporting individuals' social and emotional health. Features of SCs that qualify them as third places also position them as crucial in alleviating isolation and loneliness, reinforcing their significance within the broader social infrastructure. Implications for urban design and management include recognising SCs as accessible social infrastructure and learning from their social performance to inform inclusive, low-threshold meeting places.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106563"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vital urban environments contain a variety of places for social interaction. Shopping centres (SCs) form part of this social infrastructure and are widely used for everyday sociability. Yet limited knowledge exists on how individuals experience SCs as social arenas and how these spaces function as third places. To address this gap, the study drew on go-along interviews with fourteen men and women in a Norwegian SC. Four key themes emerged from the analysis. The first theme captured participants' appreciation of the SC and their habitual belonging to its physical environment and local community. Second, participants valued being among others, finding it fulfilling to be in the SC's vibrant environment even without verbal interaction. Third, participants engaged in casual encounters, typically brief and light-hearted exchanges. Finally, participants developed closer relationships, describing friendships they valued even when these seldom extended beyond the SC or involved sharing personal information. The findings highlight that the informal character of SCs provides neutral and accessible settings for diverse forms of social contact. The study also underscores the role of SCs as inclusive third places that accommodate both routinised and unstructured social interactions, thereby supporting individuals' social and emotional health. Features of SCs that qualify them as third places also position them as crucial in alleviating isolation and loneliness, reinforcing their significance within the broader social infrastructure. Implications for urban design and management include recognising SCs as accessible social infrastructure and learning from their social performance to inform inclusive, low-threshold meeting places.
“这是最好的地方!”一项定性研究将购物中心列为第三名
重要的城市环境包含各种各样的社会互动场所。购物中心(SCs)是社会基础设施的一部分,被广泛用于日常社交活动。然而,关于个人如何将SCs作为社会舞台以及这些空间如何作为第三空间发挥作用的知识有限。为了解决这一差距,该研究对挪威一家SC的14名男性和女性进行了访谈。分析得出了四个关键主题。第一个主题捕捉了参与者对SC的欣赏以及他们对其自然环境和当地社区的习惯。其次,参与者重视与他人在一起,即使没有语言互动,也能在SC充满活力的环境中感到满足。第三,参与者进行随意的接触,通常是简短而轻松的交流。最后,参与者发展了更亲密的关系,描述了他们所重视的友谊,即使这些友谊很少扩展到SC之外或涉及分享个人信息。研究结果强调,SCs的非正式特征为各种形式的社会接触提供了中性和无障碍的环境。该研究还强调了SCs作为包容性第三场所的作用,可以容纳常规和非结构化的社会互动,从而支持个人的社会和情感健康。SCs使其有资格成为第三的特点,也使它们在减轻孤立和孤独方面至关重要,加强了它们在更广泛的社会基础设施中的重要性。对城市设计和管理的启示包括认识到SCs是可访问的社会基础设施,并从其社会表现中学习,为包容性、低门槛的会议场所提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信