Fueling the future: A comparative analysis of sustainable aviation fuel pathways

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Shawei He , Kangyin Dong , Meng Hou , Huan Song , Ting Zhu , Ang Li , Changmin Jiang
{"title":"Fueling the future: A comparative analysis of sustainable aviation fuel pathways","authors":"Shawei He ,&nbsp;Kangyin Dong ,&nbsp;Meng Hou ,&nbsp;Huan Song ,&nbsp;Ting Zhu ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Changmin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) have been increasingly utilized in the aviation industry, the comparison among the existing types of SAF in terms of their production costs and the efficacy of mitigating emissions has become important. This investigation aims to assess the trade-off between cost increases and emission reductions throughout the SAF lifecycle. A stepwise multiple linear regression model is utilized to forecast the production costs associated with 29 distinct SAF production pathways. Furthermore, an all-encompassing model has been developed to determine the costs associated with carbon mitigation over time. The findings demonstrate that the Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) pathway is most cost-effective, with the lowest production cost pegged at $1.45 per liter. In contrast, the carbon mitigation cost for the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathway is the most favorable, calculated at $459 per ton of CO2 equivalent. This study extends current cost analyses to the prediction of future production expenses, highlighting the significance of temporal variations in mitigation costs. The findings provide customized recommendations, such as for developing SAF with different pathways with uneven priorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103843"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) have been increasingly utilized in the aviation industry, the comparison among the existing types of SAF in terms of their production costs and the efficacy of mitigating emissions has become important. This investigation aims to assess the trade-off between cost increases and emission reductions throughout the SAF lifecycle. A stepwise multiple linear regression model is utilized to forecast the production costs associated with 29 distinct SAF production pathways. Furthermore, an all-encompassing model has been developed to determine the costs associated with carbon mitigation over time. The findings demonstrate that the Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) pathway is most cost-effective, with the lowest production cost pegged at $1.45 per liter. In contrast, the carbon mitigation cost for the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathway is the most favorable, calculated at $459 per ton of CO2 equivalent. This study extends current cost analyses to the prediction of future production expenses, highlighting the significance of temporal variations in mitigation costs. The findings provide customized recommendations, such as for developing SAF with different pathways with uneven priorities.
为未来加油:可持续航空燃料途径的比较分析
随着可持续航空燃料(SAF)在航空工业中的应用越来越广泛,对现有类型的SAF进行生产成本和减排效果的比较变得非常重要。本研究旨在评估在整个SAF生命周期中成本增加和排放减少之间的权衡。利用逐步多元线性回归模型预测了29种不同的SAF生产途径的生产成本。此外,还开发了一个包罗万象的模型,以确定随时间推移与碳减缓有关的成本。研究结果表明,氢加工酯和脂肪酸(HEFA)途径是最具成本效益的,最低生产成本为每升1.45美元。相比之下,费托途径的碳减排成本是最有利的,每吨二氧化碳当量的成本为459美元。本研究将当前的成本分析扩展到对未来生产费用的预测,强调了缓解成本的时间变化的重要性。研究结果提供了定制化的建议,例如开发具有不同优先级的不同途径的SAF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信