{"title":"Understanding agricultural subsidies and factor allocation: A general equilibrium analysis","authors":"Wenbin Huang , Ashok K. Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the general equilibrium effects of agricultural subsidies on factor allocation in China. We develop a multisector dynamic general-equilibrium model that incorporates labor and land market frictions and multiple subsidy types, calibrated with data from 2002 to 2021. Results indicate that subsidies generally drew labor and capital from the nonagricultural sector, creating distortions in interindustry factor markets while reducing agriculture's output share. Subsidies increased per capita agricultural capital and land area, raising labor productivity but lowering production efficiency. Policy simulations show that shifting a greater share toward machinery subsidies improves welfare and aggregate output, optimizing China's subsidy structure. Moreover, industrial technological progress, lower migration costs, and international trade alter the effectiveness of subsidies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325003359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the general equilibrium effects of agricultural subsidies on factor allocation in China. We develop a multisector dynamic general-equilibrium model that incorporates labor and land market frictions and multiple subsidy types, calibrated with data from 2002 to 2021. Results indicate that subsidies generally drew labor and capital from the nonagricultural sector, creating distortions in interindustry factor markets while reducing agriculture's output share. Subsidies increased per capita agricultural capital and land area, raising labor productivity but lowering production efficiency. Policy simulations show that shifting a greater share toward machinery subsidies improves welfare and aggregate output, optimizing China's subsidy structure. Moreover, industrial technological progress, lower migration costs, and international trade alter the effectiveness of subsidies.
期刊介绍:
Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.