Sustainability of Asphalt Pavements: The role of life cycle assessment (LCA) and emerging technologies

IF 9
Abolfazl Afshin, Ali Behnood
{"title":"Sustainability of Asphalt Pavements: The role of life cycle assessment (LCA) and emerging technologies","authors":"Abolfazl Afshin,&nbsp;Ali Behnood","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2025.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asphalt pavements contribute significantly to the construction sector’s environmental footprint, particularly through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy use, and material extraction. This review critically evaluates the role of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) in quantifying and mitigating these impacts, with attention to how system boundaries, Product Category Rules (PCRs), and background datasets influence reported outcomes. Drawing on over 500 peer-reviewed studies, the manuscript synthesizes evidence on material and process-level strategies, such as warm-mix asphalt (WMA), high-reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) content, cold in-place recycling, bio-based binders, and waste derived additives, that demonstrate measurable reductions in life cycle indicators across different scope boundaries.</div><div>This study highlights the emerging potential of digital technologies. Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensors can generate project specific inventory data, while Artificial Intelligence (AI) enables automated data cleaning, quality control, and predictive scenario modeling. Together, these tools support the development of dynamic, high-resolution environmental profiles that improve transparency and comparability. Policy developments across the United States, European Union, and other regions illustrate how EPDs are becoming embedded in public procurement practices, with growing alignment around EN and ISO standards enhancing consistency and cross-border comparability. Despite recent advancements, several key challenges still remain unresolved, including fragmented PCR frameworks, limited high quality datasets for emerging materials, and uncertainty in modeling long-term pavement performance. To address these, this review proposes a roadmap focused on standardized impact reporting, direct measurement of material and energy flows, and verifiable digital workflows. Overall, the findings support a shift from static environmental documentation to actionable, performance-based tools that promote cleaner asphalt materials and sustainable infrastructure development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397625000553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asphalt pavements contribute significantly to the construction sector’s environmental footprint, particularly through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy use, and material extraction. This review critically evaluates the role of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) in quantifying and mitigating these impacts, with attention to how system boundaries, Product Category Rules (PCRs), and background datasets influence reported outcomes. Drawing on over 500 peer-reviewed studies, the manuscript synthesizes evidence on material and process-level strategies, such as warm-mix asphalt (WMA), high-reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) content, cold in-place recycling, bio-based binders, and waste derived additives, that demonstrate measurable reductions in life cycle indicators across different scope boundaries.
This study highlights the emerging potential of digital technologies. Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensors can generate project specific inventory data, while Artificial Intelligence (AI) enables automated data cleaning, quality control, and predictive scenario modeling. Together, these tools support the development of dynamic, high-resolution environmental profiles that improve transparency and comparability. Policy developments across the United States, European Union, and other regions illustrate how EPDs are becoming embedded in public procurement practices, with growing alignment around EN and ISO standards enhancing consistency and cross-border comparability. Despite recent advancements, several key challenges still remain unresolved, including fragmented PCR frameworks, limited high quality datasets for emerging materials, and uncertainty in modeling long-term pavement performance. To address these, this review proposes a roadmap focused on standardized impact reporting, direct measurement of material and energy flows, and verifiable digital workflows. Overall, the findings support a shift from static environmental documentation to actionable, performance-based tools that promote cleaner asphalt materials and sustainable infrastructure development.

Abstract Image

沥青路面的可持续性:生命周期评估(LCA)和新兴技术的作用
沥青路面对建筑行业的环境足迹贡献巨大,特别是通过温室气体(GHG)排放、能源使用和材料提取。这篇综述批判性地评估了生命周期评估(LCA)和环境产品声明(epd)在量化和减轻这些影响方面的作用,并关注了系统边界、产品类别规则(pcr)和背景数据集如何影响报告的结果。根据500多项同行评议的研究,该手稿综合了材料和工艺层面策略的证据,如温拌沥青(WMA)、高再生沥青路面(RAP)含量、就地冷回收、生物基粘合剂和废物衍生添加剂,这些策略显示了不同范围范围内生命周期指标的可测量减少。这项研究强调了数字技术的新兴潜力。物联网(IoT)传感器可以生成项目特定的库存数据,而人工智能(AI)可以实现自动数据清理、质量控制和预测场景建模。这些工具共同支持开发动态、高分辨率的环境概况,从而提高透明度和可比性。美国、欧盟和其他地区的政策发展表明,epd如何融入公共采购实践,围绕EN和ISO标准的一致性越来越高,从而增强了一致性和跨境可比性。尽管近年来取得了一些进展,但仍有几个关键挑战尚未解决,包括PCR框架的碎片化、新兴材料的高质量数据集有限,以及长期路面性能建模的不确定性。为了解决这些问题,本综述提出了一个路线图,重点是标准化影响报告、直接测量材料和能量流以及可验证的数字工作流程。总体而言,研究结果支持从静态环境文件转向可操作的、基于性能的工具,以促进更清洁的沥青材料和可持续的基础设施发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信