Revealing energy-economic inequality in China: A quantification and decomposition analysis

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Qingjuan Chen , Chengzhen Xu , Qunwei Wang
{"title":"Revealing energy-economic inequality in China: A quantification and decomposition analysis","authors":"Qingjuan Chen ,&nbsp;Chengzhen Xu ,&nbsp;Qunwei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unequal exchanges of energy consumption and economic benefits among provinces hinder sustainable development, underscoring the need to evaluate trade-induced disparities. Using the latest multiregional input–output tables, we examine the transfers of energy consumption and value-added embodied in China's interregional trade. We then develop a mutual EEI index and an extended EEI index to quantify bilateral and aggregate energy–economic inequality (EEI). Finally, we employ energy-related Gini coefficients to evaluate overall inequality and identify its drivers. The results reveal that: (1) in 2017, 41.12 % of energy consumption and 32.29 % of value-added were transferred across provinces, with the north, northeast, and northwest being major net exporters of energy consumption, while the southwest and northwest were net importers of value-added; (2) the highest EEI mainly occurs between developed and less developed regions, where trade benefits concentrate in more developed regions but diminish over time, whereas disadvantaged provinces are often located in the northwest; and (3) overall EEI has widened, with heavy industry and construction as the primary contributors on the production and consumption sides, respectively, and significant influences from between-group effects and coal consumption. These findings provide insights for allocating energy-saving responsibilities and distributing economic benefits more equitably, ultimately supporting sustainable trade patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 200-216"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unequal exchanges of energy consumption and economic benefits among provinces hinder sustainable development, underscoring the need to evaluate trade-induced disparities. Using the latest multiregional input–output tables, we examine the transfers of energy consumption and value-added embodied in China's interregional trade. We then develop a mutual EEI index and an extended EEI index to quantify bilateral and aggregate energy–economic inequality (EEI). Finally, we employ energy-related Gini coefficients to evaluate overall inequality and identify its drivers. The results reveal that: (1) in 2017, 41.12 % of energy consumption and 32.29 % of value-added were transferred across provinces, with the north, northeast, and northwest being major net exporters of energy consumption, while the southwest and northwest were net importers of value-added; (2) the highest EEI mainly occurs between developed and less developed regions, where trade benefits concentrate in more developed regions but diminish over time, whereas disadvantaged provinces are often located in the northwest; and (3) overall EEI has widened, with heavy industry and construction as the primary contributors on the production and consumption sides, respectively, and significant influences from between-group effects and coal consumption. These findings provide insights for allocating energy-saving responsibilities and distributing economic benefits more equitably, ultimately supporting sustainable trade patterns.
揭示中国能源经济不平等:量化与分解分析
各省之间能源消费和经济利益的不平等交换阻碍了可持续发展,强调有必要评价贸易引起的差异。利用最新的多区域投入产出表,研究了中国区域间贸易中蕴含的能源消费转移和附加值转移。然后,我们开发了一个相互的EEI指数和一个扩展的EEI指数来量化双边和总能源经济不平等(EEI)。最后,我们使用与能源相关的基尼系数来评估总体不平等并确定其驱动因素。结果表明:(1)2017年,中国能源消费和增加值的跨省转移占比分别为41.12%和32.29%,其中北部、东北和西北是能源消费的主要净出口国,而西南和西北是增加值的净进口国;(2)经济效益指数最高的地区主要分布在发达地区和欠发达地区之间,贸易利益集中在较发达地区,但随着时间的推移会逐渐减少,而弱势省份往往位于西北部;(3)整体经济效益指数有所扩大,重工业和建筑业分别是生产侧和消费侧的主要贡献者,群间效应和煤炭消费对经济效益的影响显著。这些发现为分配节能责任和更公平地分配经济利益提供了见解,最终支持可持续的贸易模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信