{"title":"Revealing energy-economic inequality in China: A quantification and decomposition analysis","authors":"Qingjuan Chen , Chengzhen Xu , Qunwei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unequal exchanges of energy consumption and economic benefits among provinces hinder sustainable development, underscoring the need to evaluate trade-induced disparities. Using the latest multiregional input–output tables, we examine the transfers of energy consumption and value-added embodied in China's interregional trade. We then develop a mutual EEI index and an extended EEI index to quantify bilateral and aggregate energy–economic inequality (EEI). Finally, we employ energy-related Gini coefficients to evaluate overall inequality and identify its drivers. The results reveal that: (1) in 2017, 41.12 % of energy consumption and 32.29 % of value-added were transferred across provinces, with the north, northeast, and northwest being major net exporters of energy consumption, while the southwest and northwest were net importers of value-added; (2) the highest EEI mainly occurs between developed and less developed regions, where trade benefits concentrate in more developed regions but diminish over time, whereas disadvantaged provinces are often located in the northwest; and (3) overall EEI has widened, with heavy industry and construction as the primary contributors on the production and consumption sides, respectively, and significant influences from between-group effects and coal consumption. These findings provide insights for allocating energy-saving responsibilities and distributing economic benefits more equitably, ultimately supporting sustainable trade patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 200-216"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unequal exchanges of energy consumption and economic benefits among provinces hinder sustainable development, underscoring the need to evaluate trade-induced disparities. Using the latest multiregional input–output tables, we examine the transfers of energy consumption and value-added embodied in China's interregional trade. We then develop a mutual EEI index and an extended EEI index to quantify bilateral and aggregate energy–economic inequality (EEI). Finally, we employ energy-related Gini coefficients to evaluate overall inequality and identify its drivers. The results reveal that: (1) in 2017, 41.12 % of energy consumption and 32.29 % of value-added were transferred across provinces, with the north, northeast, and northwest being major net exporters of energy consumption, while the southwest and northwest were net importers of value-added; (2) the highest EEI mainly occurs between developed and less developed regions, where trade benefits concentrate in more developed regions but diminish over time, whereas disadvantaged provinces are often located in the northwest; and (3) overall EEI has widened, with heavy industry and construction as the primary contributors on the production and consumption sides, respectively, and significant influences from between-group effects and coal consumption. These findings provide insights for allocating energy-saving responsibilities and distributing economic benefits more equitably, ultimately supporting sustainable trade patterns.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.