Optimizing R&D governance to enhance carbon emission mitigation: A systemic approach to the "Solow Paradox" in China

IF 15.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiang Yan , Changgao Cheng , Bo Li , Meiling Shang
{"title":"Optimizing R&D governance to enhance carbon emission mitigation: A systemic approach to the \"Solow Paradox\" in China","authors":"Xiang Yan ,&nbsp;Changgao Cheng ,&nbsp;Bo Li ,&nbsp;Meiling Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on the HK framework, this study examines the \"Solow Paradox\" between R&amp;D inputs and carbon emissions (CE) in China. We derive a production growth function with a mismatch coefficient from a multisector equilibrium model and use an extendable environmental impact assessment model to investigate the effects of total factor productivity, output shares, and factor allocation on CE. Our findings reveal the following: (1) R&amp;D element mismatches in China are alleviating, with narrowing provincial disparities; (2) mismatches create a 7.606%-11.745% gap between actual and potential R&amp;D outputs; (3) the R&amp;D \"Solow Paradox\" results in CE reductions falling 1.696%-3.602% short of ideal, with a potential annual CE reduction increase of 344.899 million tons if corrected; and (4) ineffective substitution of traditional factors and an imbalanced R&amp;D input structure contribute to regional CE change heterogeneity. While technological advancement is crucial, focusing solely on R&amp;D investment quantity and speed is insufficient under resource constraints. Enhancing R&amp;D investment efficiency and quality and correcting structural and spatial mismatches to optimize existing resources represents a more pragmatic path to achieving dual-carbon goals through front-end R&amp;D element configuration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100829"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2500174X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on the HK framework, this study examines the "Solow Paradox" between R&D inputs and carbon emissions (CE) in China. We derive a production growth function with a mismatch coefficient from a multisector equilibrium model and use an extendable environmental impact assessment model to investigate the effects of total factor productivity, output shares, and factor allocation on CE. Our findings reveal the following: (1) R&D element mismatches in China are alleviating, with narrowing provincial disparities; (2) mismatches create a 7.606%-11.745% gap between actual and potential R&D outputs; (3) the R&D "Solow Paradox" results in CE reductions falling 1.696%-3.602% short of ideal, with a potential annual CE reduction increase of 344.899 million tons if corrected; and (4) ineffective substitution of traditional factors and an imbalanced R&D input structure contribute to regional CE change heterogeneity. While technological advancement is crucial, focusing solely on R&D investment quantity and speed is insufficient under resource constraints. Enhancing R&D investment efficiency and quality and correcting structural and spatial mismatches to optimize existing resources represents a more pragmatic path to achieving dual-carbon goals through front-end R&D element configuration.
优化研发治理促进碳减排:中国“索洛悖论”的系统分析
基于香港的研究框架,本研究考察了中国研发投入与碳排放之间的“索洛悖论”。本文从多部门均衡模型中导出了一个带有错配系数的生产增长函数,并利用可扩展的环境影响评价模型来考察全要素生产率、产出份额和要素配置对环境污染的影响。研究结果表明:①中国r&d要素失配现象正在缓解,省际差异正在缩小;(2)不匹配导致实际研发产出与潜在研发产出之间存在7.606% ~ 11.745%的差距;(3)研发“索洛悖论”导致的节能减排比理想值下降了1.696% ~ 3.602%,如果修正,每年的节能减排可能增加34489.9万吨;(4)传统要素替代效率低下和研发投入结构不均衡导致了区域CE变化的异质性。虽然技术进步是至关重要的,但在资源限制下,仅仅关注研发投资的数量和速度是不够的。提高研发投资的效率和质量,纠正结构和空间不匹配以优化现有资源,是通过前端研发要素配置实现双碳目标的更为务实的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信