Xiang Yan , Changgao Cheng , Bo Li , Meiling Shang
{"title":"Optimizing R&D governance to enhance carbon emission mitigation: A systemic approach to the \"Solow Paradox\" in China","authors":"Xiang Yan , Changgao Cheng , Bo Li , Meiling Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on the HK framework, this study examines the \"Solow Paradox\" between R&D inputs and carbon emissions (CE) in China. We derive a production growth function with a mismatch coefficient from a multisector equilibrium model and use an extendable environmental impact assessment model to investigate the effects of total factor productivity, output shares, and factor allocation on CE. Our findings reveal the following: (1) R&D element mismatches in China are alleviating, with narrowing provincial disparities; (2) mismatches create a 7.606%-11.745% gap between actual and potential R&D outputs; (3) the R&D \"Solow Paradox\" results in CE reductions falling 1.696%-3.602% short of ideal, with a potential annual CE reduction increase of 344.899 million tons if corrected; and (4) ineffective substitution of traditional factors and an imbalanced R&D input structure contribute to regional CE change heterogeneity. While technological advancement is crucial, focusing solely on R&D investment quantity and speed is insufficient under resource constraints. Enhancing R&D investment efficiency and quality and correcting structural and spatial mismatches to optimize existing resources represents a more pragmatic path to achieving dual-carbon goals through front-end R&D element configuration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100829"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X2500174X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building on the HK framework, this study examines the "Solow Paradox" between R&D inputs and carbon emissions (CE) in China. We derive a production growth function with a mismatch coefficient from a multisector equilibrium model and use an extendable environmental impact assessment model to investigate the effects of total factor productivity, output shares, and factor allocation on CE. Our findings reveal the following: (1) R&D element mismatches in China are alleviating, with narrowing provincial disparities; (2) mismatches create a 7.606%-11.745% gap between actual and potential R&D outputs; (3) the R&D "Solow Paradox" results in CE reductions falling 1.696%-3.602% short of ideal, with a potential annual CE reduction increase of 344.899 million tons if corrected; and (4) ineffective substitution of traditional factors and an imbalanced R&D input structure contribute to regional CE change heterogeneity. While technological advancement is crucial, focusing solely on R&D investment quantity and speed is insufficient under resource constraints. Enhancing R&D investment efficiency and quality and correcting structural and spatial mismatches to optimize existing resources represents a more pragmatic path to achieving dual-carbon goals through front-end R&D element configuration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.