Deep Learning-Based GPR interpretation of soil thickness in headwater hillslopes

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Xiaole Han , Jintao Liu , Jian Ye , Zihe Wang , Pengfei Wu , Hai Yang
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based GPR interpretation of soil thickness in headwater hillslopes","authors":"Xiaole Han ,&nbsp;Jintao Liu ,&nbsp;Jian Ye ,&nbsp;Zihe Wang ,&nbsp;Pengfei Wu ,&nbsp;Hai Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil thickness strongly influences eco-hydrological and geomorphic processes, yet conventional measurements such as auger drilling are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for large-scale surveys. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) provides a non-invasive alternative, but its manual interpretation remains slow and prone to observer bias. To address this challenge, we developed a fully automated framework that couples a hybrid CNN-Transformer deep learning architecture with optimized signal filtering to predict soil thickness directly from GPR profiles. The convolutional layers extract local waveform features, while the attention mechanism captures long-range dependencies. Using field data from a steep headwater hillslope (H1) in the Taihu Basin, China, we compared five filtering strategies—median, Savitzky-Golay, Gaussian, moving average, and none—and found that median filtering yielded the most accurate results (R<sup>2</sup> up to 0.92, CCC of 0.96, RMSE near 10 cm). We further identified optimal filter window sizes (61–101 samples) and a training duration threshold (≥500 epochs) that ensured stable and accurate predictions. Cross-site validation on an independent hillslope (H2) without retraining showed that the pretrained CNN-Transformer model achieved the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.80), CCC (0.89), and lowest RMSE (11.3 cm), outperforming traditional machine learning models (CNN, MLP, RF, SVM) in transferability. These findings demonstrate that integrating CNN-Transformer architectures with appropriate signal filtering enables scalable, accurate, and objective soil thickness mapping in complex terrain. The proposed approach also holds promise for broader GPR-based subsurface applications, including soil horizon delineation and root system detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 117530"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil thickness strongly influences eco-hydrological and geomorphic processes, yet conventional measurements such as auger drilling are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for large-scale surveys. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) provides a non-invasive alternative, but its manual interpretation remains slow and prone to observer bias. To address this challenge, we developed a fully automated framework that couples a hybrid CNN-Transformer deep learning architecture with optimized signal filtering to predict soil thickness directly from GPR profiles. The convolutional layers extract local waveform features, while the attention mechanism captures long-range dependencies. Using field data from a steep headwater hillslope (H1) in the Taihu Basin, China, we compared five filtering strategies—median, Savitzky-Golay, Gaussian, moving average, and none—and found that median filtering yielded the most accurate results (R2 up to 0.92, CCC of 0.96, RMSE near 10 cm). We further identified optimal filter window sizes (61–101 samples) and a training duration threshold (≥500 epochs) that ensured stable and accurate predictions. Cross-site validation on an independent hillslope (H2) without retraining showed that the pretrained CNN-Transformer model achieved the highest R2 (0.80), CCC (0.89), and lowest RMSE (11.3 cm), outperforming traditional machine learning models (CNN, MLP, RF, SVM) in transferability. These findings demonstrate that integrating CNN-Transformer architectures with appropriate signal filtering enables scalable, accurate, and objective soil thickness mapping in complex terrain. The proposed approach also holds promise for broader GPR-based subsurface applications, including soil horizon delineation and root system detection.
基于深度学习的水源山坡土壤厚度探地雷达解译
土壤厚度强烈影响生态水文和地貌过程,但传统的测量方法,如螺旋钻是侵入性的,劳动密集型的,不适合大规模的调查。探地雷达(GPR)提供了一种非侵入性的替代方法,但它的人工解释仍然很慢,而且容易受到观察者的偏见。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发了一个全自动框架,将混合CNN-Transformer深度学习架构与优化的信号滤波相结合,直接从GPR剖面预测土壤厚度。卷积层提取局部波形特征,而注意机制捕获远程依赖关系。利用中国太湖盆地一个陡峭的源头山坡(H1)的野外数据,我们比较了五种滤波策略——中位数、Savitzky-Golay、高斯、移动平均和无——发现中位数滤波产生的结果最准确(R2高达0.92,CCC为0.96,RMSE接近10 cm)。我们进一步确定了最佳滤波窗口大小(61-101个样本)和训练持续时间阈值(≥500个epoch),以确保稳定和准确的预测。未经再训练的独立山坡(H2)上的跨站点验证表明,预训练的CNN- transformer模型在可转移性方面取得了最高的R2 (0.80), CCC(0.89)和最低的RMSE (11.3 cm),优于传统的机器学习模型(CNN, MLP, RF, SVM)。这些发现表明,将CNN-Transformer架构与适当的信号滤波相结合,可以在复杂地形中实现可扩展、准确和客观的土壤厚度映射。所提出的方法也有望用于更广泛的基于gpr的地下应用,包括土壤水平划分和根系检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信