Expanding Pharmacists’ Prescribing Authority and Medication Uptake: Evidence From Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

IF 2.8
AJPM focus Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.focus.2025.100415
Bita Fayaz-Farkhad PhD
{"title":"Expanding Pharmacists’ Prescribing Authority and Medication Uptake: Evidence From Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis","authors":"Bita Fayaz-Farkhad PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2025.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Considering the crisis in access to care in the U.S., pharmacies are expected to significantly expand access to a variety of preventive care, including HIV care. As of August 2024, 10 states allow pharmacists to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine taken to prevent HIV, independently. This study analyzed how the expansion of pharmacists’ authority to independently initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis affected pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates per 100,000 county residents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hand-collected data on pharmacists’ prescribing authority from 2015 to 2023 were linked to county-level pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates. Using these data, the impact of the laws was estimated through a difference-in-differences approach. The analysis first calculated changes in pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates before and after the expansions and then compared these changes between counties in states that expanded pharmacists’ scope of practice (treatment group) and counties in states that did not (control group).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Expanding pharmacists’ prescribing authority increased pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates by 11.6%. The largest effects were observed in states that allowed pharmacists to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis without any mandatory training, a requirement that may otherwise burden pharmacists. Effects were most prominent in nonrural counties and counties with high insurance coverage and lower proportions of Black and Latinx populations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that expanding pharmacists’ prescribing authority will not improve disparities in pre-exposure prophylaxis use if the laws fail to address structural barriers, such as staffing constraints or a lack of capacity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 100415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065425001038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Considering the crisis in access to care in the U.S., pharmacies are expected to significantly expand access to a variety of preventive care, including HIV care. As of August 2024, 10 states allow pharmacists to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine taken to prevent HIV, independently. This study analyzed how the expansion of pharmacists’ authority to independently initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis affected pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates per 100,000 county residents.

Methods

Hand-collected data on pharmacists’ prescribing authority from 2015 to 2023 were linked to county-level pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates. Using these data, the impact of the laws was estimated through a difference-in-differences approach. The analysis first calculated changes in pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates before and after the expansions and then compared these changes between counties in states that expanded pharmacists’ scope of practice (treatment group) and counties in states that did not (control group).

Results

Expanding pharmacists’ prescribing authority increased pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates by 11.6%. The largest effects were observed in states that allowed pharmacists to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis without any mandatory training, a requirement that may otherwise burden pharmacists. Effects were most prominent in nonrural counties and counties with high insurance coverage and lower proportions of Black and Latinx populations.

Conclusions

These results suggest that expanding pharmacists’ prescribing authority will not improve disparities in pre-exposure prophylaxis use if the laws fail to address structural barriers, such as staffing constraints or a lack of capacity.
扩大药剂师的处方权力和药物摄取:来自暴露前预防的证据
考虑到在美国获得医疗保健的危机,药店有望显著扩大获得各种预防保健的机会,包括艾滋病毒护理。截至2024年8月,10个州允许药剂师独立开展暴露前预防,这是一种预防艾滋病毒的药物。本研究分析药师独立开展暴露前预防的权力扩大对每10万县居民暴露前预防处方率的影响。方法收集2015 - 2023年药师处方授权与县级暴露前预防处方率的相关数据。利用这些数据,通过差异中的差异方法估计了这些法律的影响。该分析首先计算了扩大药剂师执业范围前后暴露前预防处方率的变化,然后比较了扩大药剂师执业范围的州县(治疗组)和未扩大药剂师执业范围的州县(对照组)之间的变化。结果扩大药师处方权限使暴露前预防处方率提高11.6%。在那些允许药剂师在没有任何强制性培训的情况下开暴露前预防处方的州,观察到的影响最大,否则这种要求可能会给药剂师带来负担。影响在非农村县和保险覆盖率高、黑人和拉丁裔人口比例较低的县最为突出。结论这些结果表明,如果法律不能解决人员配备限制或能力不足等结构性障碍,扩大药剂师的处方权限将无法改善暴露前预防使用的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书