The benefit of using access materials for soil stress reduction depends on the material’s properties and vehicle mean ground pressure

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Journal of Terramechanics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jterra.2025.101097
Loraine ten Damme , Matthias Stettler , Renato P. de Lima , Thomas Keller
{"title":"The benefit of using access materials for soil stress reduction depends on the material’s properties and vehicle mean ground pressure","authors":"Loraine ten Damme ,&nbsp;Matthias Stettler ,&nbsp;Renato P. de Lima ,&nbsp;Thomas Keller","doi":"10.1016/j.jterra.2025.101097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Construction activities can induce soil compaction due the use of heavy vehicles and repeated vehicle passes. Driving on access material reduces the risk of compaction, but data on soil stress reduction are lacking. This study investigated the effect of three access materials (0.5 m thick sand track, 0.3 m thick timber mattresses, and 0.1 m thick composite mats) on soil stress, relative to driving on unprotected soil. Mean normal stress was measured at 0.2 and 0.4 m soil depths for tracked and tyred construction vehicles (bulldozer, excavator, dump truck, and tractor-trailer). We used finite element modelling to investigate the effect of material’s thickness and stiffness on soil stress reduction. Measurements revealed that driving on access material reduced soil stress by 21–77 % and 0–60 % at 0.2 and 0.4 m depths, respectively. Stress reduction increased with increasing mean ground pressure and was larger for tyred than for tracked vehicles. The tested access materials reached a comparable effect, but simulations indicated that additional stress reduction could be achieved by increasing the stiffness or thickness of the material. Thus, more rigid or thicker material achieve greater soil stress reductions. These characteristics should be balanced against costs, transport, and ease of handling of the material.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Terramechanics","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 101097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Terramechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022489825000539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction activities can induce soil compaction due the use of heavy vehicles and repeated vehicle passes. Driving on access material reduces the risk of compaction, but data on soil stress reduction are lacking. This study investigated the effect of three access materials (0.5 m thick sand track, 0.3 m thick timber mattresses, and 0.1 m thick composite mats) on soil stress, relative to driving on unprotected soil. Mean normal stress was measured at 0.2 and 0.4 m soil depths for tracked and tyred construction vehicles (bulldozer, excavator, dump truck, and tractor-trailer). We used finite element modelling to investigate the effect of material’s thickness and stiffness on soil stress reduction. Measurements revealed that driving on access material reduced soil stress by 21–77 % and 0–60 % at 0.2 and 0.4 m depths, respectively. Stress reduction increased with increasing mean ground pressure and was larger for tyred than for tracked vehicles. The tested access materials reached a comparable effect, but simulations indicated that additional stress reduction could be achieved by increasing the stiffness or thickness of the material. Thus, more rigid or thicker material achieve greater soil stress reductions. These characteristics should be balanced against costs, transport, and ease of handling of the material.
使用通道材料减少土壤应力的好处取决于材料的性质和车辆的平均地面压力
由于重型车辆的使用和车辆的反复通行,施工活动会引起土壤压实。在通道材料上行驶减少了压实的风险,但是缺乏关于土壤应力减少的数据。研究了三种通道材料(0.5 m厚沙道、0.3 m厚木垫和0.1 m厚复合垫)对无防护土壤行驶时土壤应力的影响。测量履带式和轮式施工车辆(推土机、挖掘机、自卸车和牵引车-拖车)在0.2 m和0.4 m土壤深度的平均正常应力。采用有限元模型研究了材料厚度和刚度对土体应力减小的影响。测量结果显示,在0.2 m和0.4 m深度,对通道材料的驱动分别降低了21 - 77%和0 - 60%的土壤应力。应力减小量随着平均地压力的增加而增加,轮胎车辆的应力减小量大于履带车辆。测试的接触材料达到了类似的效果,但模拟表明,可以通过增加材料的刚度或厚度来实现额外的应力降低。因此,更硬或更厚的材料实现更大的土壤应力降低。这些特性应与成本、运输和材料处理的便利性相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Terramechanics
Journal of Terramechanics 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Terramechanics is primarily devoted to scientific articles concerned with research, design, and equipment utilization in the field of terramechanics. The Journal of Terramechanics is the leading international journal serving the multidisciplinary global off-road vehicle and soil working machinery industries, and related user community, governmental agencies and universities. The Journal of Terramechanics provides a forum for those involved in research, development, design, innovation, testing, application and utilization of off-road vehicles and soil working machinery, and their sub-systems and components. The Journal presents a cross-section of technical papers, reviews, comments and discussions, and serves as a medium for recording recent progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书