Predictive validity of progress test scores and academic achievement on SMLE performance among Saudi medical graduates

IF 2.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saleh Alrebish PhD
{"title":"Predictive validity of progress test scores and academic achievement on SMLE performance among Saudi medical graduates","authors":"Saleh Alrebish PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Progress testing (PT) has been increasingly adopted in KSA medical education as a longitudinal assessment strategy. However, limited research has explored its predictive validity concerning high-stakes licensing examinations such as the Saudi Medical Licensing Examination (SMLE). This study determined whether final-year Saudi Progress Test (SPT) scores, alongside cumulative grade point average (cGPA), predict SMLE performance among medical graduates.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included 820 medical graduates from a single Saudi medical school. Students' cumulative grade point average (cGPA), final-year SPT scores, and SMLE results were analyzed. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients assessed associations between variables, whereas ANOVA with post-hoc testing compared outcomes across cGPA categories. The relationship between SPT performance bands and the number of SMLE attempts was also explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SPT scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with SMLE performance (r = 0.415, p &lt; 0.001), whereas cGPA showed a stronger correlation (r = 0.605, p &lt; 0.001). Discipline-specific correlations between SPT and SMLE scores ranged from r = 0.175 (Pediatrics) to r = 0.330 (Internal Medicine). Students scoring below 30 % on the SPT were significantly more likely to require multiple SMLE attempts, suggesting a potential early-risk threshold.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Final-year SPT performance moderately predicts SMLE outcomes and provides insights complementary to cGPA. Progress testing may serve as a formative tool to identify at-risk students and support targeted interventions, thereby enhancing readiness for licensure. As this was a single-center study, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Future research should validate results across multiple institutions and explore longitudinal predictive models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 709-718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S165836122500109X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Progress testing (PT) has been increasingly adopted in KSA medical education as a longitudinal assessment strategy. However, limited research has explored its predictive validity concerning high-stakes licensing examinations such as the Saudi Medical Licensing Examination (SMLE). This study determined whether final-year Saudi Progress Test (SPT) scores, alongside cumulative grade point average (cGPA), predict SMLE performance among medical graduates.

Material and methods

This retrospective cohort study included 820 medical graduates from a single Saudi medical school. Students' cumulative grade point average (cGPA), final-year SPT scores, and SMLE results were analyzed. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients assessed associations between variables, whereas ANOVA with post-hoc testing compared outcomes across cGPA categories. The relationship between SPT performance bands and the number of SMLE attempts was also explored.

Results

SPT scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with SMLE performance (r = 0.415, p < 0.001), whereas cGPA showed a stronger correlation (r = 0.605, p < 0.001). Discipline-specific correlations between SPT and SMLE scores ranged from r = 0.175 (Pediatrics) to r = 0.330 (Internal Medicine). Students scoring below 30 % on the SPT were significantly more likely to require multiple SMLE attempts, suggesting a potential early-risk threshold.

Conclusion

Final-year SPT performance moderately predicts SMLE outcomes and provides insights complementary to cGPA. Progress testing may serve as a formative tool to identify at-risk students and support targeted interventions, thereby enhancing readiness for licensure. As this was a single-center study, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Future research should validate results across multiple institutions and explore longitudinal predictive models.
进展测试分数和学业成绩对沙特医科毕业生中小学生学业表现的预测效度
进展测试(PT)作为一种纵向评估策略在KSA医学教育中被越来越多地采用。然而,有限的研究探讨了其对高风险执照考试的预测有效性,如沙特医疗执照考试(SMLE)。本研究确定了最后一年的沙特进步测试(SPT)分数和累积平均绩点(cGPA)是否能预测医学毕业生的SMLE表现。材料和方法本回顾性队列研究包括来自沙特一所医学院的820名医学毕业生。学生的累积平均成绩(cGPA),最后一年的SPT成绩和SMLE结果进行了分析。Pearson’s和Spearman’s相关系数评估了变量之间的关联,而采用事后检验的方差分析比较了不同cGPA类别的结果。本文还探讨了SPT性能波段与SMLE尝试次数之间的关系。结果spt得分与SMLE成绩呈中等正相关(r = 0.415, p < 0.001),而cGPA表现出较强的相关性(r = 0.605, p < 0.001)。SPT和SMLE评分之间的学科特异性相关性从r = 0.175(儿科)到r = 0.330(内科)。SPT得分低于30%的学生更有可能需要多次SMLE尝试,这表明存在潜在的早期风险阈值。结论最后一年的SPT表现可以适度预测SMLE结果,并提供与cGPA互补的见解。进度测试可以作为一种形成性工具,识别有风险的学生并支持有针对性的干预措施,从而提高获得许可的准备程度。由于这是一项单中心研究,研究结果应谨慎解读。未来的研究应该验证跨多个机构的结果,并探索纵向预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
130
审稿时长
29 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书