Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock using optimized support vector and kernel-based extreme learning machine models

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yajuan Wu , Tao Wen , Xinshuang Sun , Yankun Wang
{"title":"Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock using optimized support vector and kernel-based extreme learning machine models","authors":"Yajuan Wu ,&nbsp;Tao Wen ,&nbsp;Xinshuang Sun ,&nbsp;Yankun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is a vital parameter that reflects the fundamental mechanical properties of rocks, playing an indispensable role in rock mass classification and the establishment of rock mass failure criteria. Currently, two methods, namely the direct and indirect methods, are employed to determine the UCS. The direct method, however, is high-priced and time-consuming. Consequently, the development of a stable and efficient indirect method holds great significance. In this study, kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) and support vector regression (SVR) are utilized to construct prediction models. Additionally, five metaheuristic optimization algorithms are introduced to strengthen the performance of the prediction models. Ten ensemble models are developed to predict the UCS. Using six input variables, an optimal prediction model is established based on four performance indicators. To address the stochasticity of model outputs, each model is run 100 times to obtain 100 output results. Furthermore, score analysis, uncertainty analysis and Wilcoxon test are employed to evaluate the superiority or inferiority of prediction models more precisely, respectively. The results imply that the HOA-KELM model receives the highest values for <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> (0.9168), <em>VAF</em> (95.5308%), <em>WI</em> (0.9784) and <em>PI</em> (−11.4660), while achieving the lowest <em>RMSE</em> (13.3381), with a total score of 20 using KELM-based ensemble models, and the PSO-SVR model receives the highest values for <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> (0.9440), <em>VAF</em> (96.9933%), <em>WI</em> (0.9733), and <em>PI</em> (−9.02626) while achieving the lowest <em>RMSE</em> (10.9402) and <em>MAE</em> (8.1081), with a total score of 20 using SVR-based ensemble models. Compared with the HOA-KELM model, the PSO-SVR model has been proven to have higher prediction accuracy by drawing the Taylor diagram. Therefore, the PSO-SVR model surpasses alternative models, establishing it as the preferred option for predicting the UCS of rocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"16 12","pages":"Article 103779"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925005209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is a vital parameter that reflects the fundamental mechanical properties of rocks, playing an indispensable role in rock mass classification and the establishment of rock mass failure criteria. Currently, two methods, namely the direct and indirect methods, are employed to determine the UCS. The direct method, however, is high-priced and time-consuming. Consequently, the development of a stable and efficient indirect method holds great significance. In this study, kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) and support vector regression (SVR) are utilized to construct prediction models. Additionally, five metaheuristic optimization algorithms are introduced to strengthen the performance of the prediction models. Ten ensemble models are developed to predict the UCS. Using six input variables, an optimal prediction model is established based on four performance indicators. To address the stochasticity of model outputs, each model is run 100 times to obtain 100 output results. Furthermore, score analysis, uncertainty analysis and Wilcoxon test are employed to evaluate the superiority or inferiority of prediction models more precisely, respectively. The results imply that the HOA-KELM model receives the highest values for R2 (0.9168), VAF (95.5308%), WI (0.9784) and PI (−11.4660), while achieving the lowest RMSE (13.3381), with a total score of 20 using KELM-based ensemble models, and the PSO-SVR model receives the highest values for R2 (0.9440), VAF (96.9933%), WI (0.9733), and PI (−9.02626) while achieving the lowest RMSE (10.9402) and MAE (8.1081), with a total score of 20 using SVR-based ensemble models. Compared with the HOA-KELM model, the PSO-SVR model has been proven to have higher prediction accuracy by drawing the Taylor diagram. Therefore, the PSO-SVR model surpasses alternative models, establishing it as the preferred option for predicting the UCS of rocks.
基于优化支持向量和基于核的极限学习机模型的岩石单轴抗压强度估计
单轴抗压强度(UCS)是反映岩石基本力学特性的重要参数,在岩体分类和岩体破坏准则的制定中起着不可缺少的作用。目前,确定UCS的方法主要有直接法和间接法两种。然而,直接的方法是昂贵和耗时的。因此,开发一种稳定、高效的间接方法具有重要意义。本研究利用核极值学习机(KELM)和支持向量回归(SVR)构建预测模型。此外,还引入了五种元启发式优化算法来增强预测模型的性能。开发了10个集成模型来预测UCS。使用6个输入变量,基于4个性能指标建立最优预测模型。为了解决模型输出的随机性,每个模型运行100次,得到100个输出结果。此外,采用分数分析、不确定性分析和Wilcoxon检验分别更精确地评价预测模型的优劣性。结果表明:HOA-KELM模型的R2(0.9168)、VAF(95.5308%)、WI(0.9784)和PI(- 11.4660)最高,RMSE(13.3381)最低,总分为20分;PSO-SVR模型的R2(0.9440)、VAF(96.9933%)、WI(0.9733)和PI(- 9.02626)最高,RMSE(10.9402)和MAE(8.1081)最低,总分为20分。与HOA-KELM模型相比,通过绘制泰勒图证明了PSO-SVR模型具有更高的预测精度。因此,PSO-SVR模型超越了其他模型,成为预测岩石UCS的首选模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信