{"title":"Propensity score analysis of treat-and-extend therapy with aflibercept versus faricimab in age-related macular degeneration","authors":"Akira Obana, Ryo Asaoka, Kaori Ishii, Risa Nakazawa, Kei Asaoka, Norikazu Matsumura, Yuko Gohto","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study compared the 15-month outcomes of treat-and-extend (TAE) therapy with aflibercept (Af) and faricimab (Fa) in comparable cases selected by propensity score matching (PSM).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-seven eyes in the Af and Fa groups were matched for age, sex, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), age-related macular degeneration subtype, intraretinal fluid, and subretinal hyperreflective material. The TAE regimen consisted of three monthly injections, followed by monthly interval adjustments up to a maximum of four months. Changes in BCVA and CMT were assessed after 15 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 15 months, dry macula was achieved in 35 eyes (74.5 %) in the AF group and 37 eyes (78.7 %) in the Fa group. Both groups revealed significant improvements in the BCVA and CMT with no intergroup differences. The mean number of injections was identical (6.4 ± 0.7). No serious systemic adverse events occurred after 303 injections in either group. One Fa-treated eye developed a large subretinal hemorrhage that required displacement surgery, and no other serious ocular complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PSM analysis demonstrated that Fa-based TAE was as effective as Af-based TAE in real-world practice, providing a foundation for evaluating long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study compared the 15-month outcomes of treat-and-extend (TAE) therapy with aflibercept (Af) and faricimab (Fa) in comparable cases selected by propensity score matching (PSM).
Design
Retrospective observational study.
Methods
Forty-seven eyes in the Af and Fa groups were matched for age, sex, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), age-related macular degeneration subtype, intraretinal fluid, and subretinal hyperreflective material. The TAE regimen consisted of three monthly injections, followed by monthly interval adjustments up to a maximum of four months. Changes in BCVA and CMT were assessed after 15 months.
Results
At 15 months, dry macula was achieved in 35 eyes (74.5 %) in the AF group and 37 eyes (78.7 %) in the Fa group. Both groups revealed significant improvements in the BCVA and CMT with no intergroup differences. The mean number of injections was identical (6.4 ± 0.7). No serious systemic adverse events occurred after 303 injections in either group. One Fa-treated eye developed a large subretinal hemorrhage that required displacement surgery, and no other serious ocular complications were noted.
Conclusions
PSM analysis demonstrated that Fa-based TAE was as effective as Af-based TAE in real-world practice, providing a foundation for evaluating long-term outcomes.