Beyond the hype: Organisational adoption of Generative AI through the lens of the TOE framework–A mixed methods perspective

IF 27 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Laurie Hughes , Fern Davies , Keyao Li , Senali Madugoda Gunaratnege , Tegwen Malik , Yogesh K Dwivedi
{"title":"Beyond the hype: Organisational adoption of Generative AI through the lens of the TOE framework–A mixed methods perspective","authors":"Laurie Hughes ,&nbsp;Fern Davies ,&nbsp;Keyao Li ,&nbsp;Senali Madugoda Gunaratnege ,&nbsp;Tegwen Malik ,&nbsp;Yogesh K Dwivedi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is widely accepted that the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has been nothing short of transformational, with tangible impacts on industry, education, healthcare and government. But beyond the headlines, how are organisations actually using GenAI, what are the key challenges experienced by decision makers and has the reality on the ground matched the hype? This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, utilising the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework to reveal greater insights to how organisations are adopting GenAI, the drivers that affect decision making and the key challenges associated with greater use of the technology. This research adopts a mixed method approach incorporating an explorative qualitative step with industry participants followed by a survey of 304 (three hundred and four) decision makers from a cross section of industry sectors from around the world including: North America, Europe, Africa, Australia and Asia, to gain further insight to the underlying factors that drive GenAI adoption. The research model was validated using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and reveals the intricate and inherent complexities related to greater levels of GenAI adoption. The analysis highlights the critical role of change capacity of the organisation in moderating complexity and staff skills. This research provides valuable and timely insights for senior management and policy makers that are attempting to better understand the interdependencies and perspectives on the key challenges facing organisations looking to deliver greater impact on organisational performance through GenAI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102982"},"PeriodicalIF":27.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401225001148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has been nothing short of transformational, with tangible impacts on industry, education, healthcare and government. But beyond the headlines, how are organisations actually using GenAI, what are the key challenges experienced by decision makers and has the reality on the ground matched the hype? This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, utilising the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework to reveal greater insights to how organisations are adopting GenAI, the drivers that affect decision making and the key challenges associated with greater use of the technology. This research adopts a mixed method approach incorporating an explorative qualitative step with industry participants followed by a survey of 304 (three hundred and four) decision makers from a cross section of industry sectors from around the world including: North America, Europe, Africa, Australia and Asia, to gain further insight to the underlying factors that drive GenAI adoption. The research model was validated using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and reveals the intricate and inherent complexities related to greater levels of GenAI adoption. The analysis highlights the critical role of change capacity of the organisation in moderating complexity and staff skills. This research provides valuable and timely insights for senior management and policy makers that are attempting to better understand the interdependencies and perspectives on the key challenges facing organisations looking to deliver greater impact on organisational performance through GenAI.
超越炒作:通过TOE框架的镜头组织采用生成式人工智能-混合方法的视角
人们普遍认为,生成式人工智能(GenAI)的影响不亚于变革,对工业、教育、医疗保健和政府产生了切实的影响。但是,除了这些头条新闻之外,组织实际上是如何使用GenAI的,决策者遇到的主要挑战是什么,实际情况是否与宣传相符?本研究采用混合方法,利用技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架来揭示组织如何采用GenAI,影响决策的驱动因素以及与更多使用该技术相关的关键挑战。本研究采用混合方法,首先对行业参与者进行探索性定性调查,然后对来自世界各地(包括北美、欧洲、非洲、澳大利亚和亚洲)的304名(340名)决策者进行调查,以进一步了解推动GenAI采用的潜在因素。该研究模型使用结构方程模型(SEM)进行了验证,并揭示了与更高水平的GenAI采用相关的复杂和固有的复杂性。分析强调了组织变革能力在调节复杂性和员工技能方面的关键作用。这项研究为高级管理层和政策制定者提供了有价值和及时的见解,他们试图更好地理解组织面临的主要挑战的相互依赖性和观点,这些挑战希望通过GenAI对组织绩效产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信