Ergonomic risk assessment methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare workers: A systematic review

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2025.10.001
Grace Gao , Shamay S.M. Ng , Siu Shing Man , Billy C.L. So
{"title":"Ergonomic risk assessment methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare workers: A systematic review","authors":"Grace Gao ,&nbsp;Shamay S.M. Ng ,&nbsp;Siu Shing Man ,&nbsp;Billy C.L. So","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent among healthcare professionals due to the physically demanding nature of their work environments. These disorders increase costs associated with workers’ compensation claims and healthcare services, reduce productivity, and negatively impact the quality of life for affected workers. Therefore, proper ergonomic risk assessment tools are vital for monitoring and preventing WMSDs among healthcare professionals. <em>Method:</em> This study provides a comprehensive overview of ergonomic risk assessment techniques used among healthcare workers. Following an extensive search, 31 studies published in English from 2014 to 2024 were identified. <em>Results:</em> With growing awareness of ergonomic risks in healthcare settings, research has explored various assessment methods to understand and mitigate these risks among healthcare workers across different disciplines. This finding highlights the significant role of self-reported and observation-based methods, despite potential subjective biases. Despite their challenges and underutilization, direct measurement methods have demonstrated substantial potential for enhancing ergonomic assessments when appropriately adapted to healthcare environments. <em>Conclusions and practical applications:</em> In future research, a longitudinal study design incorporating ergonomic risk assessment tools and hybrid methodologies integrating simulated settings with real-world observations should be employed to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of ergonomic risks among healthcare professionals. This approach would contribute to the development of effective interventions aimed at mitigating WMSDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"95 ","pages":"Pages 189-196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243752500146X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent among healthcare professionals due to the physically demanding nature of their work environments. These disorders increase costs associated with workers’ compensation claims and healthcare services, reduce productivity, and negatively impact the quality of life for affected workers. Therefore, proper ergonomic risk assessment tools are vital for monitoring and preventing WMSDs among healthcare professionals. Method: This study provides a comprehensive overview of ergonomic risk assessment techniques used among healthcare workers. Following an extensive search, 31 studies published in English from 2014 to 2024 were identified. Results: With growing awareness of ergonomic risks in healthcare settings, research has explored various assessment methods to understand and mitigate these risks among healthcare workers across different disciplines. This finding highlights the significant role of self-reported and observation-based methods, despite potential subjective biases. Despite their challenges and underutilization, direct measurement methods have demonstrated substantial potential for enhancing ergonomic assessments when appropriately adapted to healthcare environments. Conclusions and practical applications: In future research, a longitudinal study design incorporating ergonomic risk assessment tools and hybrid methodologies integrating simulated settings with real-world observations should be employed to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of ergonomic risks among healthcare professionals. This approach would contribute to the development of effective interventions aimed at mitigating WMSDs.
卫生保健工作者中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的人体工程学风险评估方法:系统综述
导读:工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)在医疗保健专业人员中很普遍,因为他们的工作环境对身体的要求很高。这些疾病增加了与工人索赔和医疗保健服务相关的成本,降低了生产率,并对受影响工人的生活质量产生了负面影响。因此,适当的人体工程学风险评估工具对于监测和预防医疗保健专业人员的WMSDs至关重要。方法:本研究提供了一个全面的概述人体工程学风险评估技术中使用的卫生保健工作者。经过广泛的搜索,确定了2014年至2024年用英语发表的31项研究。结果:随着人们对卫生保健环境中人体工程学风险的认识不断提高,研究人员探索了各种评估方法,以了解和减轻不同学科卫生保健工作者的这些风险。这一发现强调了自我报告和基于观察的方法的重要作用,尽管存在潜在的主观偏见。尽管存在挑战和未充分利用,但直接测量方法已显示出在适当适应医疗保健环境时加强人体工程学评估的巨大潜力。结论和实际应用:在未来的研究中,应该采用纵向研究设计,结合人体工程学风险评估工具和混合方法,将模拟环境与现实世界的观察相结合,以促进对医疗保健专业人员的人体工程学风险的综合评估。这种做法将有助于制定旨在减轻大规模杀伤性武器的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书