Children leverage predictive representations for flexible, value-guided choice

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Alice Zhang , Ari E. Kahn , Nathaniel D. Daw , Kate Nussenbaum , Catherine A. Hartley
{"title":"Children leverage predictive representations for flexible, value-guided choice","authors":"Alice Zhang ,&nbsp;Ari E. Kahn ,&nbsp;Nathaniel D. Daw ,&nbsp;Kate Nussenbaum ,&nbsp;Catherine A. Hartley","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By harnessing a mental model of how the world works, learners can make flexible choices in changing environments. However, while children and adolescents readily acquire structured knowledge of their environments, relative to adults, they often demonstrate weaker signatures of leveraging this knowledge to plan actions. One explanation for these developmental differences is that using a mental model to prospectively simulate potential choices and their outcomes is computationally costly, taxing cognitive mechanisms that develop into adulthood. Here, we ask whether children effectively leverage structured knowledge to make flexible choices by relying on two alternative strategies that do not require costly mental simulation at choice time. First, through offline replanning, models can be queried before the time of choice to update the values of potential actions. Second, an abstracted predictive model, known as a successor representation (SR), can enable simplified computation of long-run reward values of candidate actions without requiring iterative simulation of multiple time steps. Here, across three experiments, we assessed whether children, adolescents, and adults aged 7–23 years similarly harness these learning strategies. In a reward revaluation task, we found that children flexibly updated their behavior by leveraging structured knowledge, but that across age, the opportunity for offline replanning during rest did not influence behavior. While participants may have leveraged a detailed mental model of the task structure, they may have also relied on simplified, predictive representations to guide their choices. We then directly tested whether children use predictive representations and observed early-emerging use of the SR, providing a mechanistic account of how children use structured knowledge to guide choice without detailed model-based simulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By harnessing a mental model of how the world works, learners can make flexible choices in changing environments. However, while children and adolescents readily acquire structured knowledge of their environments, relative to adults, they often demonstrate weaker signatures of leveraging this knowledge to plan actions. One explanation for these developmental differences is that using a mental model to prospectively simulate potential choices and their outcomes is computationally costly, taxing cognitive mechanisms that develop into adulthood. Here, we ask whether children effectively leverage structured knowledge to make flexible choices by relying on two alternative strategies that do not require costly mental simulation at choice time. First, through offline replanning, models can be queried before the time of choice to update the values of potential actions. Second, an abstracted predictive model, known as a successor representation (SR), can enable simplified computation of long-run reward values of candidate actions without requiring iterative simulation of multiple time steps. Here, across three experiments, we assessed whether children, adolescents, and adults aged 7–23 years similarly harness these learning strategies. In a reward revaluation task, we found that children flexibly updated their behavior by leveraging structured knowledge, but that across age, the opportunity for offline replanning during rest did not influence behavior. While participants may have leveraged a detailed mental model of the task structure, they may have also relied on simplified, predictive representations to guide their choices. We then directly tested whether children use predictive representations and observed early-emerging use of the SR, providing a mechanistic account of how children use structured knowledge to guide choice without detailed model-based simulation.
儿童利用预测表征灵活,价值导向的选择
通过利用世界如何运作的心智模型,学习者可以在不断变化的环境中做出灵活的选择。然而,虽然儿童和青少年很容易获得有关环境的结构化知识,但相对于成年人,他们在利用这些知识来计划行动方面往往表现出较弱的特征。对这些发展差异的一种解释是,使用心理模型来前瞻性地模拟潜在的选择及其结果在计算上是昂贵的,对成年后发展的认知机制造成了负担。在这里,我们询问儿童是否有效地利用结构化知识做出灵活的选择,依靠两种替代策略,不需要昂贵的心理模拟在选择时间。首先,通过离线重规划,可以在选择时间之前查询模型,以更新潜在动作的值。其次,一个抽象的预测模型,即后继表示(SR),可以简化候选行为的长期奖励值的计算,而不需要多个时间步长的迭代模拟。在这里,通过三个实验,我们评估了儿童、青少年和7-23岁的成年人是否同样利用这些学习策略。在奖励重估任务中,我们发现儿童通过利用结构化知识灵活地更新他们的行为,但在不同年龄,休息期间离线重新规划的机会对行为没有影响。虽然参与者可能利用了任务结构的详细心理模型,但他们也可能依赖于简化的预测性表征来指导他们的选择。然后,我们直接测试了儿童是否使用预测性表征,并观察了早期出现的SR使用,提供了儿童如何使用结构化知识指导选择的机制说明,而没有详细的基于模型的模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信