The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival for out of hospital cardiac arrest: a causal inference analysis

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Laith Alhuneafat , Thomas A Murray , Nicholas J Johnson , Cindy Hsu , Brian Grunau , Tamas Alexy , Demetris Yannopoulos , Jason Bartos , Joseph E. Tonna
{"title":"The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival for out of hospital cardiac arrest: a causal inference analysis","authors":"Laith Alhuneafat ,&nbsp;Thomas A Murray ,&nbsp;Nicholas J Johnson ,&nbsp;Cindy Hsu ,&nbsp;Brian Grunau ,&nbsp;Tamas Alexy ,&nbsp;Demetris Yannopoulos ,&nbsp;Jason Bartos ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Tonna","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; <em>p</em> = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, <em>p</em> = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, <em>p</em> = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, <em>p</em> = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain.

Methods

We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW).

Results

Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; p = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, p = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, p = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, p = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge.

Conclusions

PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.
体外心肺复苏后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对院外心脏骤停患者生存的影响:因果推理分析
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可提高急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生存率,并已在近期的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)随机试验中得到应用。然而,PCI在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的ECPR中的作用仍不确定。方法:我们分析了2020年1月至2022年12月在高容量中心接受ECPR的体外生命支持组织(ELSO)登记的成年OHCA患者。根据PCI接受情况对患者进行分层。我们应用倾向评分加权来平衡预测接受PCI的概率的协变量,包括年份、年龄、性别、种族、合并症的定量负担、ECMO血流开始前的CPR持续时间、初始心脏骤停节律和中心水平的病例量。主要终点是存活至出院。我们使用多变量逻辑回归和逆概率加权(IPW)估计校正优势比(aORs)。结果576例行ECPR的成年OHCA患者中,有138例(24.3%)行PCI。PCI患者更有可能在家中骤停(59.4%对46.1%,p = 0.049),并且作为首次检测到的心律,心室颤动(VF)的初始发病率更高(68.1%对48.9%,p < 0.001)。两组之间的生存率相似(PCI: 18.1%,非PCI: 20.1%)。校正后的因果推理分析,包括多变量logistic回归(OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.56-1.75, p = 0.98)、逆概率加权(OR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.58-1.82, p = 0.93)和增强IPW模型(OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.58-1.93, p = 0.85),均显示PCI与生存至出院之间无统计学意义的关联。结论spci与成人ECPR患者的生存率无相关性。这些发现强调需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明PCI在ECPR中的作用,并确定可能从这种干预中受益的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信