The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival for out of hospital cardiac arrest: a causal inference analysis
Laith Alhuneafat , Thomas A Murray , Nicholas J Johnson , Cindy Hsu , Brian Grunau , Tamas Alexy , Demetris Yannopoulos , Jason Bartos , Joseph E. Tonna
{"title":"The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival for out of hospital cardiac arrest: a causal inference analysis","authors":"Laith Alhuneafat , Thomas A Murray , Nicholas J Johnson , Cindy Hsu , Brian Grunau , Tamas Alexy , Demetris Yannopoulos , Jason Bartos , Joseph E. Tonna","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; <em>p</em> = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, <em>p</em> = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, <em>p</em> = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, <em>p</em> = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain.
Methods
We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW).
Results
Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; p = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, p = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, p = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, p = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge.
Conclusions
PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.