Optimising mini-grid efficiency in Ghana: A techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production from redundant solar energy for fuel cell power generation

IF 7.6 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Louis Kwasi Osei , Richard Opoku , Flavio Odoi-Yorke , Charles K.K Sekyere , George Yaw Obeng , Francis Kofi Forson
{"title":"Optimising mini-grid efficiency in Ghana: A techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production from redundant solar energy for fuel cell power generation","authors":"Louis Kwasi Osei ,&nbsp;Richard Opoku ,&nbsp;Flavio Odoi-Yorke ,&nbsp;Charles K.K Sekyere ,&nbsp;George Yaw Obeng ,&nbsp;Francis Kofi Forson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural mini-grids in Ghana often experience substantial midday solar PV generation surpluses due to mismatches between peak production and local demand, with excess energy (redundant energy) frequently curtailed once batteries are fully charged. This underutilisation limits the socio-economic benefits of renewable electrification and highlights the need for alternative long-duration storage solutions. This study investigated the techno-economic feasibility of converting excess PV energy from a 54 kWp mini-grid in Aglakope, Ghana, into hydrogen via electrolysis, storing it, and reconverting it to electricity using fuel cells. Redundant energy generation was quantified using measured PV output and load consumption and validated using statistical error metrics (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.955). Hydrogen production and recovery potential were modelled for different electrolyser technologies, and system performance was evaluated using round-trip efficiency (RTE), levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH), and levelized cost of storage (LCOS), with comparative analysis against additional battery capacity. The results yielded an average monthly excess energy of about 2250 kWh, convertible into 43–53 kg per month of hydrogen depending on electrolyser type. The proposed hydrogen-fuel cell pathway yielded a RTE of 44.4 %, LCOH of $4.97/kg, and LCOS of $0.249/kWh, which is about 13 % higher than lithium-ion storage benchmarks. The study findings demonstrate that hydrogen storage can complement batteries, offer seasonal and multi-day storage capability, and reduce renewable curtailment. Therefore, wider adoption could be supported by cost reductions, efficiency improvements, and enabling policies, positioning hydrogen-based storage as a viable pathway for resilient, low-carbon rural electrification in off-grid contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101309"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525004416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural mini-grids in Ghana often experience substantial midday solar PV generation surpluses due to mismatches between peak production and local demand, with excess energy (redundant energy) frequently curtailed once batteries are fully charged. This underutilisation limits the socio-economic benefits of renewable electrification and highlights the need for alternative long-duration storage solutions. This study investigated the techno-economic feasibility of converting excess PV energy from a 54 kWp mini-grid in Aglakope, Ghana, into hydrogen via electrolysis, storing it, and reconverting it to electricity using fuel cells. Redundant energy generation was quantified using measured PV output and load consumption and validated using statistical error metrics (R2 = 0.955). Hydrogen production and recovery potential were modelled for different electrolyser technologies, and system performance was evaluated using round-trip efficiency (RTE), levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH), and levelized cost of storage (LCOS), with comparative analysis against additional battery capacity. The results yielded an average monthly excess energy of about 2250 kWh, convertible into 43–53 kg per month of hydrogen depending on electrolyser type. The proposed hydrogen-fuel cell pathway yielded a RTE of 44.4 %, LCOH of $4.97/kg, and LCOS of $0.249/kWh, which is about 13 % higher than lithium-ion storage benchmarks. The study findings demonstrate that hydrogen storage can complement batteries, offer seasonal and multi-day storage capability, and reduce renewable curtailment. Therefore, wider adoption could be supported by cost reductions, efficiency improvements, and enabling policies, positioning hydrogen-based storage as a viable pathway for resilient, low-carbon rural electrification in off-grid contexts.
优化加纳的微型电网效率:利用多余的太阳能为燃料电池发电生产氢的技术经济分析
由于峰值产量与当地需求之间的不匹配,加纳农村微型电网经常经历正午太阳能光伏发电的大量过剩,一旦电池充满电,过剩能源(冗余能源)往往会减少。这种利用不足限制了可再生能源电气化的社会经济效益,并强调了对替代长期存储解决方案的需求。本研究调查了加纳Aglakope 54 kWp微型电网将多余的光伏能源通过电解转化为氢气、储存并使用燃料电池将其重新转化为电能的技术经济可行性。使用测量的光伏输出和负荷消耗来量化冗余发电量,并使用统计误差指标进行验证(R2 = 0.955)。对不同电解槽技术的制氢和回收潜力进行了建模,并通过往返效率(RTE)、氢的平准化成本(LCOH)和平准化存储成本(LCOS)对系统性能进行了评估,并与额外的电池容量进行了比较分析。结果平均每月产生约2250千瓦时的多余能量,根据电解槽类型,每月可转换为43-53公斤的氢气。提出的氢燃料电池途径的RTE为44.4%,LCOH为4.97美元/千克,LCOS为0.249美元/千瓦时,比锂离子存储基准高出约13%。研究结果表明,氢储存可以补充电池,提供季节性和多日储存能力,并减少可再生能源的弃电。因此,可以通过降低成本、提高效率和扶持政策来支持更广泛的采用,将氢基储能定位为离网环境下有弹性的低碳农村电气化的可行途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信