Alicia Boatswain-Kyte , Kofi Antwi-Boasiako , Philip Baiden , Nico Trocmé , Barbara Fallon , Tonino Esposito , Tara Black , Peter Mackenzie , Kristin Lwin
{"title":"Racial disparities in child welfare: A propensity score matched analysis of Black and White children in Canada","authors":"Alicia Boatswain-Kyte , Kofi Antwi-Boasiako , Philip Baiden , Nico Trocmé , Barbara Fallon , Tonino Esposito , Tara Black , Peter Mackenzie , Kristin Lwin","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research has revealed significant disparities in child welfare (CW) involvement for Black children in Canada. However, the underlying factors contributing to these differences remain poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to identify the factors influencing racial disparities in CW investigations and out-of-home placements, with a focus on understanding the broader structural and institutional drivers shaping CW outcomes for Black children in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Data were drawn from the 2019 Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-2019). The fully weighted sample included an estimated 134,925 investigations involving White families and 28,415 investigations involving Black families.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A two-stage analytical approach was employed using the weighted and unweighted sample. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used on the unweighted sample to examine racial disparities in out-of-home placement while controlling for case differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicate that Black children were investigated for maltreatment at 2.27 times the rate of White children. Out-of-home placement rates were also higher (3.4 vs. 1.9 per 1000; 1.79 times per capita). After matching, Black children remained more likely to be placed in out-of home care, with a rate more than double that of their white counterparts (3.1 % vs. 1.5 %; LR = 0.004, <em>p</em> = 0.004)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight a compounded effect of bias across Black children's CW trajectories, suggesting a need to address both structural and institutional factors that contribute to disparities in CW investigations and out-of-home placement decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 107728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425004843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research has revealed significant disparities in child welfare (CW) involvement for Black children in Canada. However, the underlying factors contributing to these differences remain poorly understood.
Objective
This study aims to identify the factors influencing racial disparities in CW investigations and out-of-home placements, with a focus on understanding the broader structural and institutional drivers shaping CW outcomes for Black children in Canada.
Participants and setting
Data were drawn from the 2019 Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-2019). The fully weighted sample included an estimated 134,925 investigations involving White families and 28,415 investigations involving Black families.
Methods
A two-stage analytical approach was employed using the weighted and unweighted sample. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used on the unweighted sample to examine racial disparities in out-of-home placement while controlling for case differences.
Results
Findings indicate that Black children were investigated for maltreatment at 2.27 times the rate of White children. Out-of-home placement rates were also higher (3.4 vs. 1.9 per 1000; 1.79 times per capita). After matching, Black children remained more likely to be placed in out-of home care, with a rate more than double that of their white counterparts (3.1 % vs. 1.5 %; LR = 0.004, p = 0.004)
Conclusion
These findings highlight a compounded effect of bias across Black children's CW trajectories, suggesting a need to address both structural and institutional factors that contribute to disparities in CW investigations and out-of-home placement decisions.
背景研究揭示了加拿大黑人儿童在儿童福利(CW)参与方面的显著差异。然而,造成这些差异的潜在因素仍然知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在确定在儿童保育调查和家庭外安置中影响种族差异的因素,重点了解影响加拿大黑人儿童儿童保育结果的更广泛的结构和制度驱动因素。参与者和环境数据来自2019年加拿大报告的儿童虐待和忽视发生率研究(CIS-2019)。完全加权的样本包括大约134925项涉及白人家庭的调查和28415项涉及黑人家庭的调查。方法采用加权和未加权两阶段分析方法。在控制个案差异的情况下,在未加权样本上使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)来检查家庭外安置的种族差异。结果黑人儿童被调查受虐待的比率是白人儿童的2.27倍。家庭外安置率也更高(3.4比1.9千;人均1.79次)。匹配后,黑人儿童仍然更有可能被安置在家庭外照顾,其比例是白人儿童的两倍多(3.1% vs. 1.5%; LR = 0.004, p = 0.004)。结论这些研究结果突出了黑人儿童儿童保育轨迹中偏见的复合效应,表明需要解决导致儿童保育调查和家庭外安置决策差异的结构性和制度性因素。
期刊介绍:
Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.