Measuring flourishing for transitional youth aging out of foster care in the United States: Factor structure and invariance of the flourishing index

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Deborah J. Moon , Jeesoo Jeon , Amanda Cruce , Hyunjin Lee , Ruijie Ma , Brendan W. Case
{"title":"Measuring flourishing for transitional youth aging out of foster care in the United States: Factor structure and invariance of the flourishing index","authors":"Deborah J. Moon ,&nbsp;Jeesoo Jeon ,&nbsp;Amanda Cruce ,&nbsp;Hyunjin Lee ,&nbsp;Ruijie Ma ,&nbsp;Brendan W. Case","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mental health field is shifting toward a greater focus on the presence of mental health beyond the assessment and treatment of mental illness. <em>Flourishing</em> is an emerging concept that captures the ultimate health and well-being in multiple dimensions. The knowledge of youth flourishing is crucial to promoting the mental health of all youths beyond those with mental illness. Despite the increased interest in youth flourishing, limited studies examined flourishing among disadvantaged youth. Moreover, a limited number of validated measures exist that can accurately measure flourishing for marginalized youth of different demographics. This paper presents the results from the Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (FA) of the adolescent version of the Flourishing Index using the data collected from youth aging out of foster care (18–24 years old) who participated in the Flourishing After Foster Care study, a national survey of 379 transitional youth aging out of foster care. Additionally, we examined measurement invariance between the transitional youth of different sexes [male (n = 256) vs female (n = 89)], race [White (n = 272) vs youth of color (n = 83)], and sexual orientation [heterosexual (n = 282) vs sexual minority (n = 92)]. The results from the FAs supported a one-dimensional model with 10 items, which showed excellent fit (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.021). Measurement invariance was supported based on sex and sexual orientation but not on race. Partial invariance was supported based on race with the exclusion of one item related to delayed gratification. Future research should build on these findings to further explore flourishing indicators for youths across different identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325001306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental health field is shifting toward a greater focus on the presence of mental health beyond the assessment and treatment of mental illness. Flourishing is an emerging concept that captures the ultimate health and well-being in multiple dimensions. The knowledge of youth flourishing is crucial to promoting the mental health of all youths beyond those with mental illness. Despite the increased interest in youth flourishing, limited studies examined flourishing among disadvantaged youth. Moreover, a limited number of validated measures exist that can accurately measure flourishing for marginalized youth of different demographics. This paper presents the results from the Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (FA) of the adolescent version of the Flourishing Index using the data collected from youth aging out of foster care (18–24 years old) who participated in the Flourishing After Foster Care study, a national survey of 379 transitional youth aging out of foster care. Additionally, we examined measurement invariance between the transitional youth of different sexes [male (n = 256) vs female (n = 89)], race [White (n = 272) vs youth of color (n = 83)], and sexual orientation [heterosexual (n = 282) vs sexual minority (n = 92)]. The results from the FAs supported a one-dimensional model with 10 items, which showed excellent fit (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.021). Measurement invariance was supported based on sex and sexual orientation but not on race. Partial invariance was supported based on race with the exclusion of one item related to delayed gratification. Future research should build on these findings to further explore flourishing indicators for youths across different identities.
衡量美国过渡性非寄养青年的繁荣:繁荣指数的因素结构和不变性
心理健康领域正在转向更加关注心理健康的存在,而不仅仅是对精神疾病的评估和治疗。繁荣是一个新兴的概念,它在多个维度上抓住了最终的健康和幸福。了解青年蓬勃发展对于促进除精神疾病之外的所有青年的精神健康至关重要。尽管对青少年繁荣的兴趣越来越大,但对弱势青少年繁荣的研究有限。此外,现有的有效措施数量有限,无法准确衡量不同人口结构的边缘化青年的繁荣程度。本文利用参与“寄养后的繁荣”研究的18-24岁的非寄养青年(379名过渡性非寄养青年)的数据,对青少年版繁荣指数进行了探索性和验证性因素分析(FA)。此外,我们还检验了不同性别(男性(n = 256) vs女性(n = 89))、种族(白人(n = 272) vs有色人种(n = 83))和性取向(异性恋(n = 282) vs性少数(n = 92))之间的测量不变性。问卷调查结果支持包含10个条目的一维模型,拟合效果良好(CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.021)。测量不变性是基于性别和性取向的,而不是基于种族的。支持基于种族的部分不变性,排除了一个与延迟满足相关的项目。未来的研究应以这些发现为基础,进一步探索不同身份青年的繁荣指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信