Effect of defocus distance and energy density on melt pool morphology, surface roughness, and grain orientation of 70/30 copper-nickel alloy in laser powder bed fusion
IF 5.5 2区 材料科学Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
{"title":"Effect of defocus distance and energy density on melt pool morphology, surface roughness, and grain orientation of 70/30 copper-nickel alloy in laser powder bed fusion","authors":"Mahdi Nadimi , Lucy Waite , Jie Song , Yao Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the impact of defocus distance (D) and volumetric energy density (E<sub>v</sub>) on the melt pool morphology, surface properties, and microstructure of a pre-alloyed 70/30 copper‑nickel fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Samples were created with defocus distances ranging from −20 mm to 20 mm and energy densities between 125.0 and 381.0 J/mm<sup>3</sup>. Analysis methods included optical microscopy, surface topography, and electron backscatter diffraction. A defocus distance of −10 mm combined with moderate energy density (125.0–222.2 J/mm<sup>3</sup>) yielded deep V-shaped melt pools, low surface roughness (Ra = 23.6 μm), well-aligned crystallographic textures with a Multiple of Uniform Density (MUD) of 6.59. Positive defocus (D = 20 mm) with high energy density produced shallow, disk-like melt pools with acceptable roughness, favoring (001) crystallographic texture. Although deep V-shaped melt pools enable enhanced penetration, they are more susceptible to defects caused by keyhole formation. Conversely, shallow disk-shaped conduction mode melt pools offer better stability and fewer surface irregularities, but they may suffer from insufficient penetration and other drawbacks. These findings highlight the potential of using defocus parameter as a key design parameter to optimize melt pool characteristics for specific material and process requirements in LPBF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18727,"journal":{"name":"Materials Characterization","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 115605"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044580325008940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the impact of defocus distance (D) and volumetric energy density (Ev) on the melt pool morphology, surface properties, and microstructure of a pre-alloyed 70/30 copper‑nickel fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Samples were created with defocus distances ranging from −20 mm to 20 mm and energy densities between 125.0 and 381.0 J/mm3. Analysis methods included optical microscopy, surface topography, and electron backscatter diffraction. A defocus distance of −10 mm combined with moderate energy density (125.0–222.2 J/mm3) yielded deep V-shaped melt pools, low surface roughness (Ra = 23.6 μm), well-aligned crystallographic textures with a Multiple of Uniform Density (MUD) of 6.59. Positive defocus (D = 20 mm) with high energy density produced shallow, disk-like melt pools with acceptable roughness, favoring (001) crystallographic texture. Although deep V-shaped melt pools enable enhanced penetration, they are more susceptible to defects caused by keyhole formation. Conversely, shallow disk-shaped conduction mode melt pools offer better stability and fewer surface irregularities, but they may suffer from insufficient penetration and other drawbacks. These findings highlight the potential of using defocus parameter as a key design parameter to optimize melt pool characteristics for specific material and process requirements in LPBF.
期刊介绍:
Materials Characterization features original articles and state-of-the-art reviews on theoretical and practical aspects of the structure and behaviour of materials.
The Journal focuses on all characterization techniques, including all forms of microscopy (light, electron, acoustic, etc.,) and analysis (especially microanalysis and surface analytical techniques). Developments in both this wide range of techniques and their application to the quantification of the microstructure of materials are essential facets of the Journal.
The Journal provides the Materials Scientist/Engineer with up-to-date information on many types of materials with an underlying theme of explaining the behavior of materials using novel approaches. Materials covered by the journal include:
Metals & Alloys
Ceramics
Nanomaterials
Biomedical materials
Optical materials
Composites
Natural Materials.