Subjective-objective median-based importance technique (SOMIT) to aid multi-criteria renewable energy evaluation

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ding Ding , Yang Li , Poh Ling Neo , Zhiyuan Wang , Chongwu Xia
{"title":"Subjective-objective median-based importance technique (SOMIT) to aid multi-criteria renewable energy evaluation","authors":"Ding Ding ,&nbsp;Yang Li ,&nbsp;Poh Ling Neo ,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Chongwu Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accelerating the renewable energy transition requires informed decision-making that accounts for the diverse financial, technical, environmental, and social trade-offs across different renewable energy technologies. A critical step in this multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process is the determination of appropriate criteria weights. However, deriving these weights often solely involves either subjective assessment from decision-makers or objective weighting methods, each of which has limitations in terms of cognitive burden, potential bias, and insufficient contextual relevance. This study proposes the subjective-objective median-based importance technique (SOMIT), a novel hybrid approach for determining criteria weights in MCDM. By tailoring SOMIT to renewable energy evaluation, the method directly supports applied energy system planning, policy analysis, and technology prioritization under carbon neutrality goals. The practical utility of SOMIT is demonstrated through two MCDM case studies on renewable energy decision-making in India and Saudi Arabia. Using the derived weights from SOMIT, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method ranks the renewable energy alternatives, with solar power achieving the highest performance scores in both cases (e.g., 0.5725 in the India case). The main contributions of this work are five-fold: 1) the proposed SOMIT reduces the number of required subjective comparisons from the conventional quadratic order to a linear order; 2) SOMIT is more robust to outliers in the alternatives-criteria matrix (ACM); 3) SOMIT balances subjective expert knowledge with objective data-driven insights, thereby mitigating bias; 4) SOMIT is inherently modular, allowing both its individual parts and the complete approach to be seamlessly coupled with a wide range of MCDM methods commonly applied in energy systems and policy analysis; 5) a dedicated Python library, pysomit, is developed for SOMIT, providing an accessible and efficient tool to implement SOMIT in practical renewable energy evaluation and decision-support applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 126872"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925016022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accelerating the renewable energy transition requires informed decision-making that accounts for the diverse financial, technical, environmental, and social trade-offs across different renewable energy technologies. A critical step in this multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process is the determination of appropriate criteria weights. However, deriving these weights often solely involves either subjective assessment from decision-makers or objective weighting methods, each of which has limitations in terms of cognitive burden, potential bias, and insufficient contextual relevance. This study proposes the subjective-objective median-based importance technique (SOMIT), a novel hybrid approach for determining criteria weights in MCDM. By tailoring SOMIT to renewable energy evaluation, the method directly supports applied energy system planning, policy analysis, and technology prioritization under carbon neutrality goals. The practical utility of SOMIT is demonstrated through two MCDM case studies on renewable energy decision-making in India and Saudi Arabia. Using the derived weights from SOMIT, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method ranks the renewable energy alternatives, with solar power achieving the highest performance scores in both cases (e.g., 0.5725 in the India case). The main contributions of this work are five-fold: 1) the proposed SOMIT reduces the number of required subjective comparisons from the conventional quadratic order to a linear order; 2) SOMIT is more robust to outliers in the alternatives-criteria matrix (ACM); 3) SOMIT balances subjective expert knowledge with objective data-driven insights, thereby mitigating bias; 4) SOMIT is inherently modular, allowing both its individual parts and the complete approach to be seamlessly coupled with a wide range of MCDM methods commonly applied in energy systems and policy analysis; 5) a dedicated Python library, pysomit, is developed for SOMIT, providing an accessible and efficient tool to implement SOMIT in practical renewable energy evaluation and decision-support applications.

Abstract Image

主客观基于中值的重要度技术(SOMIT)辅助多准则可再生能源评价
加速可再生能源转型需要明智的决策,考虑到不同可再生能源技术之间的各种金融、技术、环境和社会权衡。多准则决策(MCDM)过程中的一个关键步骤是确定适当的准则权重。然而,获得这些权重通常只涉及决策者的主观评估或客观加权方法,每种方法在认知负担、潜在偏见和上下文相关性不足方面都有局限性。本研究提出了主客观基于中值的重要性技术(SOMIT),一种用于确定MCDM中标准权重的新型混合方法。通过将SOMIT调整为可再生能源评估,该方法直接支持在碳中和目标下的应用能源系统规划、政策分析和技术优先排序。通过对印度和沙特阿拉伯可再生能源决策的两个MCDM案例研究,证明了SOMIT的实际效用。利用从SOMIT中获得的权重,TOPSIS方法对可再生能源替代品进行排序,其中太阳能在两种情况下都获得了最高的性能分数(例如,印度的0.5725)。这项工作的主要贡献有五个方面:1)提出的SOMIT将所需的主观比较次数从传统的二次阶减少到线性阶;2)在备选准则矩阵(ACM)中,SOMIT对异常值具有更强的鲁棒性;3) SOMIT平衡了主观的专家知识和客观的数据驱动的见解,从而减轻了偏见;4) SOMIT本质上是模块化的,允许其单个部件和完整的方法与广泛的MCDM方法无缝耦合,这些方法通常应用于能源系统和政策分析;5)针对SOMIT开发了专门的Python库pysomit,为在实际可再生能源评估和决策支持应用中实现SOMIT提供了一个可访问且高效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信