Multi-directional synergistic effects of air-cooling and liquid-cooling on the thermal runaway propagation of lithium-ion batteries

IF 6.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Lele Li , Peizhao Lyu , Xianjie Han , Menghan Li , Zhonghao Rao
{"title":"Multi-directional synergistic effects of air-cooling and liquid-cooling on the thermal runaway propagation of lithium-ion batteries","authors":"Lele Li ,&nbsp;Peizhao Lyu ,&nbsp;Xianjie Han ,&nbsp;Menghan Li ,&nbsp;Zhonghao Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal runaway (TR) in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) remains a critical bottleneck hindering their widespread adoption. Investigating and mitigating TR propagation (TRP) is essential for ensuring the safety of electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (EESs). This study conducted a numerical investigation on the synergistic effects of combined air–liquid cooling systems. A three-dimensional TRP model was established to systematically analyze the impact of standalone air-cooling, standalone liquid-cooling, and the coupled interaction of both cooling methods on TRP under different flow direction configurations. Simulation results indicate that air-cooling exhibits a superior inhibitory effect on batteries in a thermal runaway state, while liquid-cooling demonstrates better performance in inhibiting the propagation of thermal runaway. Additionally, the influences of the flow direction configurations for air–liquid cooling are relatively small. Although the overall cooling effect of air–liquid co-cooling is better than that of a single cooling method, the incremental temperature reduction from co-cooling is smaller than the simple superposition of individual air-cooling and liquid-cooling effects. Notably, compared with air-cooling, liquid-cooling shows a stronger capability in suppressing TRP. These findings provide an important theoretical basis for optimizing cooling system design and balancing heat dissipation efficiency with safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"281 ","pages":"Article 128629"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431125032211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal runaway (TR) in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) remains a critical bottleneck hindering their widespread adoption. Investigating and mitigating TR propagation (TRP) is essential for ensuring the safety of electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems (EESs). This study conducted a numerical investigation on the synergistic effects of combined air–liquid cooling systems. A three-dimensional TRP model was established to systematically analyze the impact of standalone air-cooling, standalone liquid-cooling, and the coupled interaction of both cooling methods on TRP under different flow direction configurations. Simulation results indicate that air-cooling exhibits a superior inhibitory effect on batteries in a thermal runaway state, while liquid-cooling demonstrates better performance in inhibiting the propagation of thermal runaway. Additionally, the influences of the flow direction configurations for air–liquid cooling are relatively small. Although the overall cooling effect of air–liquid co-cooling is better than that of a single cooling method, the incremental temperature reduction from co-cooling is smaller than the simple superposition of individual air-cooling and liquid-cooling effects. Notably, compared with air-cooling, liquid-cooling shows a stronger capability in suppressing TRP. These findings provide an important theoretical basis for optimizing cooling system design and balancing heat dissipation efficiency with safety.
空冷和液冷对锂离子电池热失控传播的多向协同效应
锂离子电池(LIBs)的热失控(TR)仍然是阻碍其广泛应用的关键瓶颈。研究和减少TR传播(TRP)对于确保电动汽车(ev)和储能系统(EESs)的安全至关重要。本文对空气-液体联合冷却系统的协同效应进行了数值研究。建立了三维TRP模型,系统分析了不同流向配置下单机风冷、单机液冷以及两种冷却方式的耦合相互作用对TRP的影响。仿真结果表明,风冷对电池热失控的抑制效果较好,而液冷对电池热失控的抑制效果较好。此外,气流方向配置对气液冷却的影响相对较小。虽然空液共冷的整体冷却效果优于单一冷却方式,但共冷的增量降温效果小于单个风冷和液冷效果的简单叠加。值得注意的是,与风冷相比,液冷对TRP的抑制能力更强。这些研究结果为优化冷却系统设计、平衡散热效率和安全性提供了重要的理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信