Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov methods for turbomachinery steady aerodynamic analysis

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Computers & Fluids Pub Date : 2025-12-15 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106852
Sen Zhang, Yuxuan Zhang, Dingxi Wang
{"title":"Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov methods for turbomachinery steady aerodynamic analysis","authors":"Sen Zhang,&nbsp;Yuxuan Zhang,&nbsp;Dingxi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents the algorithm development of a Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov (JFNK) solver for turbomachinery steady aerodynamic analysis, based on the three-dimensional Favre-averaged Navier–Stokes (FANS) equations. The Jacobian-free approach achieves accurate Jacobian-vector calculation using automatic differentiation, avoiding the complexity of explicitly forming a full Jacobian matrix. A lower–upper Symmetric-Gauss–Seidel (LU-SGS) preconditioner and a geometric multigrid preconditioner are proposed in this work to further enhance convergence. The two preconditioners are also compared with the standard incomplete LU factorization (ILU) preconditioner. The LU-SGS preconditioner does not rely on any explicit matrix, resulting in a fully matrix-free Newton–Krylov solver, while both the ILU and multigrid preconditioners require the explicit formation of an approximate Jacobian matrix. The performance of the developed JFNK solver is benchmarked against that of a standalone multigrid solver, which employs a multistage Runge–Kutta time-stepping scheme with an LU-SGS residual smoother. Two transonic compressor test cases are used for performance evaluation. Numerical results consistently reveal that the multigrid-preconditioned JFNK solver achieves a faster convergence rate than the standalone multigrid solver, while the other preconditioning cases require significantly more computational time. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed multigrid preconditioner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 106852"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025003123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the algorithm development of a Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov (JFNK) solver for turbomachinery steady aerodynamic analysis, based on the three-dimensional Favre-averaged Navier–Stokes (FANS) equations. The Jacobian-free approach achieves accurate Jacobian-vector calculation using automatic differentiation, avoiding the complexity of explicitly forming a full Jacobian matrix. A lower–upper Symmetric-Gauss–Seidel (LU-SGS) preconditioner and a geometric multigrid preconditioner are proposed in this work to further enhance convergence. The two preconditioners are also compared with the standard incomplete LU factorization (ILU) preconditioner. The LU-SGS preconditioner does not rely on any explicit matrix, resulting in a fully matrix-free Newton–Krylov solver, while both the ILU and multigrid preconditioners require the explicit formation of an approximate Jacobian matrix. The performance of the developed JFNK solver is benchmarked against that of a standalone multigrid solver, which employs a multistage Runge–Kutta time-stepping scheme with an LU-SGS residual smoother. Two transonic compressor test cases are used for performance evaluation. Numerical results consistently reveal that the multigrid-preconditioned JFNK solver achieves a faster convergence rate than the standalone multigrid solver, while the other preconditioning cases require significantly more computational time. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed multigrid preconditioner.
涡轮机械稳态气动分析的无雅可比Newton-Krylov方法
本文介绍了基于三维favre -average Navier-Stokes (FANS)方程的涡轮机械定常气动分析的无雅可比牛顿-克雷洛夫(JFNK)求解器的算法发展。无雅可比矩阵方法通过自动微分实现精确的雅可比向量计算,避免了显式形成完整雅可比矩阵的复杂性。为了进一步提高收敛性,本文提出了一种上下对称高斯-塞德尔(LU-SGS)预调节器和一种几何多网格预调节器。并与标准的不完全LU分解(ILU)预条件进行了比较。LU-SGS预调节器不依赖于任何显式矩阵,从而产生完全无矩阵的Newton-Krylov解算器,而ILU和多网格预调节器都需要显式形成近似的雅可比矩阵。开发的JFNK求解器的性能与独立多网格求解器的性能进行了基准测试,该多网格求解器采用多级龙格-库塔时间步进方案和lug - sgs残差平滑器。采用两个跨音速压气机测试用例进行性能评估。数值结果一致表明,多网格预条件下的JFNK求解器比独立多网格预条件下的JFNK求解器收敛速度更快,而其他预条件下的计算时间明显增加。这些结果证明了所提出的多网格预调节器的有效性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书