{"title":"Hepatic and pericardial fat in coronary computed tomography angiography and its association with coronary artery disease","authors":"O. Konukoglu, M. Kaya, C. Gungor, B.C. Arslan","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.107080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of both hepatosteatosis and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT) with coronary artery disease (CAD).</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>The coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images of 331 consecutive patients were retrospectively analysed. Epicardial and paracardial fat areas and hepatic attenuation values were measured on the same images. The presence and severity of coronary artery stenosis were assessed, and the coronary calcium burden was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>No correlation was observed between the presence or severity of CAD and steatosis in either group. However, the proportion of patients with moderate and severe calcium scores was significantly higher in the steatosis group (<em>P</em>=0.016). EAT and PAT values were statistically significantly higher in the steatosis group than in the nonsteatosis group across both readers (<em>P</em><0.05). Similarly, in patients with CAD, EAT and PAT values were statistically significantly higher than in those without CAD across both readers (<em>P</em><0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that PAT measurements significantly differed between individuals with and without CAD, with consistent results from both readers.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>EAT and PAT values may be considered more useful than hepatosteatosis in assessing the risk of CAD. These parameters could serve as independent markers for determining the presence and severity of CAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 107080"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025002855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of both hepatosteatosis and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT) with coronary artery disease (CAD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images of 331 consecutive patients were retrospectively analysed. Epicardial and paracardial fat areas and hepatic attenuation values were measured on the same images. The presence and severity of coronary artery stenosis were assessed, and the coronary calcium burden was calculated.
RESULTS
No correlation was observed between the presence or severity of CAD and steatosis in either group. However, the proportion of patients with moderate and severe calcium scores was significantly higher in the steatosis group (P=0.016). EAT and PAT values were statistically significantly higher in the steatosis group than in the nonsteatosis group across both readers (P<0.05). Similarly, in patients with CAD, EAT and PAT values were statistically significantly higher than in those without CAD across both readers (P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that PAT measurements significantly differed between individuals with and without CAD, with consistent results from both readers.
CONCLUSION
EAT and PAT values may be considered more useful than hepatosteatosis in assessing the risk of CAD. These parameters could serve as independent markers for determining the presence and severity of CAD.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.