Ana Sofia Fonseca , Jesper Baldtzer Liisberg , Jakob Klenø Nøjgaard , Frederika Pleva , Søren Bendt Jensen , Stefanos Agathokleous , Teresa Moreno , Katie Kedwell-Simmering , Carlos Casado , Jesús Ángel Encinas , Martin Lehmann , Keld Alstrup Jensen
{"title":"Impact of air purifiers on occupational particle exposure in an enclosed bus workshop","authors":"Ana Sofia Fonseca , Jesper Baldtzer Liisberg , Jakob Klenø Nøjgaard , Frederika Pleva , Søren Bendt Jensen , Stefanos Agathokleous , Teresa Moreno , Katie Kedwell-Simmering , Carlos Casado , Jesús Ángel Encinas , Martin Lehmann , Keld Alstrup Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workers in bus workshops are exposed to elevated concentrations of fine (PM<sub>2.5</sub>, <2.5 µm) and ultrafine particles (UFP, <0.1 µm) from diesel exhaust, brake and tire wear, and mechanical operations, which are associated with adverse respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. To characterize exposures and evaluate mitigation strategies, two measurement campaigns were conducted in a bus workshop. Particle number concentrations (PNC), size distributions, black carbon (BC), elemental and organic carbon (EC/OC), and particulate mass (PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>4</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>) were monitored at near field, breathing zones, and far field locations during maintenance tasks. The first campaign established baseline conditions, while the second assessed the impact of four air purifiers (APs). Baseline monitoring showed exposure peaks during high-emission activities such as brake servicing, and cold engine starts, with PNCs reaching 4.5 × 10<sup>5</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> and PM<sub>4</sub> up to 549 µg m<sup>-3</sup>. While gravimetric concentrations remained below mass-based occupational exposure limits, UFPs and EC exceeded precautionary health benchmarks. The use of APs increased the effective air exchange rate and reduced PNCs (<700 nm) by 38%, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>4</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> by 45%, 49%, and 53%, respectively. EC decreased by 46%, whereas BC and OC showed negligible changes. Size-resolved analysis confirmed highest removal efficiency for coarse particles (60% at 10 µm) and lowest (33%) within 300-700 nm range, the most penetrating particle size. This study demonstrates that bus workshops present clear risks of occupational particle exposure, and that APs can significantly reduce concentrations, though limitations remain for UFPs and semi-volatile organics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 113823"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325012934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Workers in bus workshops are exposed to elevated concentrations of fine (PM2.5, <2.5 µm) and ultrafine particles (UFP, <0.1 µm) from diesel exhaust, brake and tire wear, and mechanical operations, which are associated with adverse respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. To characterize exposures and evaluate mitigation strategies, two measurement campaigns were conducted in a bus workshop. Particle number concentrations (PNC), size distributions, black carbon (BC), elemental and organic carbon (EC/OC), and particulate mass (PM2.5, PM4, PM10) were monitored at near field, breathing zones, and far field locations during maintenance tasks. The first campaign established baseline conditions, while the second assessed the impact of four air purifiers (APs). Baseline monitoring showed exposure peaks during high-emission activities such as brake servicing, and cold engine starts, with PNCs reaching 4.5 × 105 cm-3 and PM4 up to 549 µg m-3. While gravimetric concentrations remained below mass-based occupational exposure limits, UFPs and EC exceeded precautionary health benchmarks. The use of APs increased the effective air exchange rate and reduced PNCs (<700 nm) by 38%, and PM2.5, PM4, and PM10 by 45%, 49%, and 53%, respectively. EC decreased by 46%, whereas BC and OC showed negligible changes. Size-resolved analysis confirmed highest removal efficiency for coarse particles (60% at 10 µm) and lowest (33%) within 300-700 nm range, the most penetrating particle size. This study demonstrates that bus workshops present clear risks of occupational particle exposure, and that APs can significantly reduce concentrations, though limitations remain for UFPs and semi-volatile organics.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.