Machine-learning modeling of water, oil, and solids content in oil-based drilling muds: An alternative approach to retort test

IF 5.4 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Shadfar Davoodi , Evgeny Burnaev , Amir H. Mohammadi
{"title":"Machine-learning modeling of water, oil, and solids content in oil-based drilling muds: An alternative approach to retort test","authors":"Shadfar Davoodi ,&nbsp;Evgeny Burnaev ,&nbsp;Amir H. Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.138500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring the content of water, oil, and solids in oil-based muds (OBMs) is crucial in maintaining a smooth and efficient well-drilling process. Nevertheless, the only measurement method available, the retort test, is time-consuming, preventing the drilling-mud crew from frequently measuring these three OBM parameters. To address this issue, the present study leverages a vast field dataset to build robust, novel machine-learning models that precisely predict the content of water, oil, and solids in OBMs using five frequently measured drilling fluid parameters. In this regard, following the removal of outliers and the selection of the most influential variables, four predictive models, namely, multi-layer extreme learning machine, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and their hybrid forms with particle swarm optimization (PSO), were developed and precisely evaluated using multiple performance and uncertainty measurement analyses. Among the developed models, the XGB-PSO consistently outperformed others across the training, validation, and blind testing phases, achieving the lowest average absolute relative errors in predicting the target parameters. A comprehensive performance assessment revealed that the XGB-PSO model exhibited minimal systematic bias, strong resistance to noise, the lowest risk of overfitting, as indicated by stable learning curves, and high reliability, confirmed by the narrowest bootstrapped confidence intervals. Finally, Shapley additive explanations analysis performed on the best-performing predictive models revealed mud weight as the most influential feature in predicting the target parameters. In contrast, Marsh funnel viscosity and mud type showed relatively minor influences. During drilling operations, this intelligent approach can assist the drilling-mud crew in making frequent and credible determinations of the water, oil, and solids content in OBMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":278,"journal":{"name":"Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects","volume":"728 ","pages":"Article 138500"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927775725024045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring the content of water, oil, and solids in oil-based muds (OBMs) is crucial in maintaining a smooth and efficient well-drilling process. Nevertheless, the only measurement method available, the retort test, is time-consuming, preventing the drilling-mud crew from frequently measuring these three OBM parameters. To address this issue, the present study leverages a vast field dataset to build robust, novel machine-learning models that precisely predict the content of water, oil, and solids in OBMs using five frequently measured drilling fluid parameters. In this regard, following the removal of outliers and the selection of the most influential variables, four predictive models, namely, multi-layer extreme learning machine, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and their hybrid forms with particle swarm optimization (PSO), were developed and precisely evaluated using multiple performance and uncertainty measurement analyses. Among the developed models, the XGB-PSO consistently outperformed others across the training, validation, and blind testing phases, achieving the lowest average absolute relative errors in predicting the target parameters. A comprehensive performance assessment revealed that the XGB-PSO model exhibited minimal systematic bias, strong resistance to noise, the lowest risk of overfitting, as indicated by stable learning curves, and high reliability, confirmed by the narrowest bootstrapped confidence intervals. Finally, Shapley additive explanations analysis performed on the best-performing predictive models revealed mud weight as the most influential feature in predicting the target parameters. In contrast, Marsh funnel viscosity and mud type showed relatively minor influences. During drilling operations, this intelligent approach can assist the drilling-mud crew in making frequent and credible determinations of the water, oil, and solids content in OBMs.
油基钻井泥浆中水、油和固体含量的机器学习建模:一种替代方法
监测油基泥浆(OBMs)中水、油和固体的含量对于保持钻井过程的顺利和高效至关重要。然而,唯一可用的测量方法是蒸馏水测试,这很耗时,使得钻井泥浆人员无法频繁测量这三个OBM参数。为了解决这一问题,本研究利用大量的现场数据集来建立强大的、新颖的机器学习模型,使用五种经常测量的钻井液参数来精确预测obm中水、油和固体的含量。为此,在剔除异常值和选取影响最大变量的基础上,建立了多层极端学习机、极端梯度提升(XGB)及其与粒子群优化(PSO)混合形式的预测模型,并利用多重性能和不确定度测量分析对其进行了精确评估。在开发的模型中,XGB-PSO在训练、验证和盲测阶段的表现始终优于其他模型,在预测目标参数时实现了最低的平均绝对相对误差。综合性能评估表明,XGB-PSO模型具有最小的系统偏差、较强的抗噪声能力、较低的过拟合风险(学习曲线稳定)和较高的可靠性(最窄的自启动置信区间)。最后,对表现最好的预测模型进行Shapley加性解释分析,发现泥浆比重是预测目标参数最具影响力的特征。相反,Marsh漏斗粘度和泥浆类型的影响相对较小。在钻井作业中,这种智能方法可以帮助钻井泥浆人员频繁、可靠地测定obm中的水、油和固体含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
2421
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects is an international journal devoted to the science underlying applications of colloids and interfacial phenomena. The journal aims at publishing high quality research papers featuring new materials or new insights into the role of colloid and interface science in (for example) food, energy, minerals processing, pharmaceuticals or the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信