Zone-specific real-time traffic conflict risk modeling for freeway tunnels: a CrossTabNet approach

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Jieling Jin , Jipu Li , Shan Tian , Qing Ye
{"title":"Zone-specific real-time traffic conflict risk modeling for freeway tunnels: a CrossTabNet approach","authors":"Jieling Jin ,&nbsp;Jipu Li ,&nbsp;Shan Tian ,&nbsp;Qing Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a zone-specific, real-time traffic conflict risk modeling framework specifically designed for freeway tunnels. The framework integrates traffic conflict analysis, refined tunnel segmentation, and interpretable deep learning to address limitations in traditional collision data. Vehicle trajectory data are utilized to derive surrogate safety measures based on traffic conflicts. A refined five-zone tunnel classification—pre-entrance, entrance, interior, exit, and post-exit—is adopted by extending existing zoning frameworks. This facilitates more precise spatial attribution of risk patterns in real-time conflict analysis. To model complex, interdependent risk factors, a CrossTabNet architecture is developed. This innovative structure combines a feature interaction layer with a TabNet encoder, enabling the model to capture high-order nonlinear relationships between traffic variables while maintaining interpretability through sparse attention mechanisms. The proposed model demonstrates superior predictive performance compared to established machine learning and deep learning methods. Notably, zone-specific models significantly outperform a global model trained on all data, emphasizing the necessity of localized modeling for effective tunnel safety assessment. Global sensitivity analysis reveals that the standard deviation of upstream traffic flow consistently contributes positively to conflict risk across all zones, highlighting the critical role of flow variability. Other significant features vary by tunnel segment, reflecting distinct local dynamics. These findings provide valuable insights for implementing adaptive, zone-targeted traffic safety interventions in freeway tunnel environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108274"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a zone-specific, real-time traffic conflict risk modeling framework specifically designed for freeway tunnels. The framework integrates traffic conflict analysis, refined tunnel segmentation, and interpretable deep learning to address limitations in traditional collision data. Vehicle trajectory data are utilized to derive surrogate safety measures based on traffic conflicts. A refined five-zone tunnel classification—pre-entrance, entrance, interior, exit, and post-exit—is adopted by extending existing zoning frameworks. This facilitates more precise spatial attribution of risk patterns in real-time conflict analysis. To model complex, interdependent risk factors, a CrossTabNet architecture is developed. This innovative structure combines a feature interaction layer with a TabNet encoder, enabling the model to capture high-order nonlinear relationships between traffic variables while maintaining interpretability through sparse attention mechanisms. The proposed model demonstrates superior predictive performance compared to established machine learning and deep learning methods. Notably, zone-specific models significantly outperform a global model trained on all data, emphasizing the necessity of localized modeling for effective tunnel safety assessment. Global sensitivity analysis reveals that the standard deviation of upstream traffic flow consistently contributes positively to conflict risk across all zones, highlighting the critical role of flow variability. Other significant features vary by tunnel segment, reflecting distinct local dynamics. These findings provide valuable insights for implementing adaptive, zone-targeted traffic safety interventions in freeway tunnel environments.
高速公路隧道特定区域的实时交通冲突风险建模:一种crossstabnet方法
本研究提出了一个专为高速公路隧道设计的特定区域、实时交通冲突风险建模框架。该框架集成了交通冲突分析、精细隧道分割和可解释深度学习,以解决传统碰撞数据的局限性。利用车辆轨迹数据推导出基于交通冲突的替代安全措施。通过扩展现有的分区框架,采用了精细的五区隧道分类——入口前、入口、内部、出口和出口后。这有助于在实时冲突分析中更精确地确定风险模式的空间属性。为了对复杂的、相互依赖的风险因素进行建模,开发了一个CrossTabNet架构。这种创新的结构结合了特征交互层和TabNet编码器,使模型能够捕获流量变量之间的高阶非线性关系,同时通过稀疏注意机制保持可解释性。与现有的机器学习和深度学习方法相比,所提出的模型具有优越的预测性能。值得注意的是,区域特定模型明显优于基于所有数据训练的全局模型,这强调了本地化建模对有效隧道安全评估的必要性。全局敏感性分析表明,上游交通流的标准差对各区域冲突风险的影响均呈正相关,表明流量变异性对冲突风险的影响至关重要。其他重要特征因隧道段而异,反映了不同的局部动态。这些发现为在高速公路隧道环境中实施适应性的、有针对性的交通安全干预措施提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信