Current Guidelines on Dietary Protein Intake for Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

IF 3.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Siyanga Ravi, Alexandra Fahrner, Frank Rühli, Nicole Bender
{"title":"Current Guidelines on Dietary Protein Intake for Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review","authors":"Siyanga Ravi,&nbsp;Alexandra Fahrner,&nbsp;Frank Rühli,&nbsp;Nicole Bender","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>International nutritional guidelines vary in their recommendations, as well as in the reporting quality of the underlying evidence. An underreported recommendation in guidelines for people with type II diabetes concerns the optimal protein intake in the case of chronic kidney disease (CKD).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this review, we analyze the protein intake recommendations from worldwide practice guidelines for type II diabetes and CKD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic search in the online databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as websites, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and up to 31 January, 2023. We included nutritional and clinical practice guidelines on protein intake in patients with type II diabetes and CKD of different stages. We assessed the quality of the guidelines using the instruments Appraisal of Guidelines for Research &amp; Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) and AGREE Recommendation Excellence. We assessed the quality of the underlying scientific evidence using the evidence pyramid and the level of evidence categorization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 24 included guidelines, 5 met the quality assessment of all instruments. Their evidence was based on an overlapping number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nevertheless, their protein intake recommendations differed, ranging from no restriction to restriction to 0.8 g/kg body weight/d.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The reason for the discrepancy of protein intake recommendations between different guidelines could not be determined conclusively, as the methodology of evidence assessment was often insufficiently reported. More long-term and good-quality RCTs are needed. We recommend the use of rigorous development and quality assessment tools in the development of clinical practice guidelines for patients with CKD and type II diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 107551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

International nutritional guidelines vary in their recommendations, as well as in the reporting quality of the underlying evidence. An underreported recommendation in guidelines for people with type II diabetes concerns the optimal protein intake in the case of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objectives

In this review, we analyze the protein intake recommendations from worldwide practice guidelines for type II diabetes and CKD.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in the online databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as websites, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and up to 31 January, 2023. We included nutritional and clinical practice guidelines on protein intake in patients with type II diabetes and CKD of different stages. We assessed the quality of the guidelines using the instruments Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) and AGREE Recommendation Excellence. We assessed the quality of the underlying scientific evidence using the evidence pyramid and the level of evidence categorization.

Results

Of 24 included guidelines, 5 met the quality assessment of all instruments. Their evidence was based on an overlapping number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nevertheless, their protein intake recommendations differed, ranging from no restriction to restriction to 0.8 g/kg body weight/d.

Conclusions

The reason for the discrepancy of protein intake recommendations between different guidelines could not be determined conclusively, as the methodology of evidence assessment was often insufficiently reported. More long-term and good-quality RCTs are needed. We recommend the use of rigorous development and quality assessment tools in the development of clinical practice guidelines for patients with CKD and type II diabetes.
糖尿病肾病患者膳食蛋白质摄入指南:范围综述
背景:国际营养指南的建议和基础证据的报告质量各不相同。在2型糖尿病患者指南中,关于慢性肾病(CKD)患者的最佳蛋白质摄入量的建议被低估了。目的在这篇综述中,我们分析了世界范围内II型糖尿病和CKD实践指南中推荐的蛋白质摄入量。方法我们根据系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项目,系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane系统评价数据库以及网站,检索时间截止到2023年1月31日。我们纳入了不同阶段II型糖尿病和CKD患者蛋白质摄入的营养和临床实践指南。我们使用研究指南评估工具和评估工具(AGREE II)和卓越推荐工具来评估指南的质量。我们使用证据金字塔和证据分类水平来评估基础科学证据的质量。结果24个纳入的指南中,有5个符合所有工具的质量评价。他们的证据是基于重叠数量的随机对照试验(rct)。然而,他们的蛋白质摄入量建议不同,从不限制到限制到0.8 g/kg体重/d。结论不同指南之间蛋白质摄入量建议存在差异的原因无法确定,证据评估方法的报道往往不够充分。需要更多长期和高质量的随机对照试验。我们建议在CKD和II型糖尿病患者临床实践指南的制定中使用严格的开发和质量评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信