Pore characterization of coal cuttings based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance: A new method

IF 7.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fuel Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137066
Hongda Wen , Cheng Zhai , Jizhao Xu , Yong Sun , Fei Wu , Hexiang Xu , Yu Wang
{"title":"Pore characterization of coal cuttings based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance: A new method","authors":"Hongda Wen ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhai ,&nbsp;Jizhao Xu ,&nbsp;Yong Sun ,&nbsp;Fei Wu ,&nbsp;Hexiang Xu ,&nbsp;Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coal reservoir pore complexity governs coalbed methane occurrence and migration, making core analysis essential for pore architecture characterization. However, obtaining intact cores from soft, low-permeability coal seams with weak mechanical strength and dense fractures is challenging. Consequently, drilling cuttings are often used for pore structure evaluation, necessitating assessment of their substitutability for porosity and pore size distribution analysis. To address this, we developed a low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) methodology for cuttings porosity measurement. Bituminous coal samples from Shenmu’s Zhangminggou Mine were analyzed using a 1H probe and 5 % CuSO4 centrifugation. Comparative testing employed two artificial crushing methods to prepare cuttings particles. Porosity and pore size distributions across varying particle sizes were compared with intact core data. Key findings indicate: (1) Cutting and core T2 spectra exhibit high similarity, with micropores (&lt;2 nm) and mesopores (2–50 nm) dominating pore structures; (2) Maximum porosity deviation is 3.03 %, minimized at &gt; 3.35 mm particle sizes, confirming cuttings reliability for basic reservoir characterization; (3) Fragmentation intensity critically affects measurements—total porosity increases from 10.13 % to 14.26 % as particle size decreases from 3.35 mm to 0.85 mm due to exposed occluded pores and semi-closed pore transformation, while micropore proportion rises from 53.84 % to 58.00 %. We propose a ≥ 1 mm particle size threshold, with optimal accuracy at 1.7–2.36 mm cuttings, balancing precision and closed-pore preservation. This non-destructive method enables efficient unconsolidated coal reservoir evaluation with significant engineering applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"406 ","pages":"Article 137066"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125027917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal reservoir pore complexity governs coalbed methane occurrence and migration, making core analysis essential for pore architecture characterization. However, obtaining intact cores from soft, low-permeability coal seams with weak mechanical strength and dense fractures is challenging. Consequently, drilling cuttings are often used for pore structure evaluation, necessitating assessment of their substitutability for porosity and pore size distribution analysis. To address this, we developed a low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) methodology for cuttings porosity measurement. Bituminous coal samples from Shenmu’s Zhangminggou Mine were analyzed using a 1H probe and 5 % CuSO4 centrifugation. Comparative testing employed two artificial crushing methods to prepare cuttings particles. Porosity and pore size distributions across varying particle sizes were compared with intact core data. Key findings indicate: (1) Cutting and core T2 spectra exhibit high similarity, with micropores (<2 nm) and mesopores (2–50 nm) dominating pore structures; (2) Maximum porosity deviation is 3.03 %, minimized at > 3.35 mm particle sizes, confirming cuttings reliability for basic reservoir characterization; (3) Fragmentation intensity critically affects measurements—total porosity increases from 10.13 % to 14.26 % as particle size decreases from 3.35 mm to 0.85 mm due to exposed occluded pores and semi-closed pore transformation, while micropore proportion rises from 53.84 % to 58.00 %. We propose a ≥ 1 mm particle size threshold, with optimal accuracy at 1.7–2.36 mm cuttings, balancing precision and closed-pore preservation. This non-destructive method enables efficient unconsolidated coal reservoir evaluation with significant engineering applicability.
基于低场核磁共振的煤岩屑孔隙表征新方法
煤储层孔隙复杂性决定着煤层气的赋存和运移,岩心分析是表征孔隙结构的必要条件。然而,从机械强度弱、裂缝密集的软、低渗透煤层中获取完整的岩心是一项挑战。因此,钻井岩屑常用于孔隙结构评价,需要评估其在孔隙度和孔径分布分析中的可替代性。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种低场核磁共振(LF-NMR)方法来测量岩屑孔隙度。采用1H探针和5% CuSO4离心对神木张明沟矿烟煤样品进行了分析。对比试验采用两种人工破碎方法制备岩屑颗粒。不同粒径的孔隙度和孔径分布与完整岩心数据进行了比较。主要研究结果表明:(1)岩心T2光谱与岩心T2光谱具有较高的相似性,孔隙结构以微孔(2 nm)和介孔(2 ~ 50 nm)为主;(2)孔隙度偏差最大为3.03%,在3.35 mm粒径处最小,证实了岩屑对油藏基本描述的可靠性;(3)破碎强度严重影响测量结果,由于暴露的封闭孔隙和半封闭孔隙转化,总孔隙度从3.35 mm减小到0.85 mm,总孔隙度从10.13%增加到14.26%,微孔占比从53.84%增加到58.00%。我们提出了≥1 mm的粒度阈值,最佳精度为1.7-2.36 mm,平衡了精度和闭孔保存。这种非破坏性的方法能够有效地评价松散煤储层,具有重要的工程适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信