Long-term biomass removal in grasslands reduces plant and soil phosphorus, increases carbon:phosphorus stoichiometry, but does not lead to microbial phosphorus limitation

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andrea Simpson , David Whitehead , Leo M. Condron , Kate H. Orwin , Keith C. Cameron , Niklas J. Lehto
{"title":"Long-term biomass removal in grasslands reduces plant and soil phosphorus, increases carbon:phosphorus stoichiometry, but does not lead to microbial phosphorus limitation","authors":"Andrea Simpson ,&nbsp;David Whitehead ,&nbsp;Leo M. Condron ,&nbsp;Kate H. Orwin ,&nbsp;Keith C. Cameron ,&nbsp;Niklas J. Lehto","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.110017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grassland management practices can disrupt the stoichiometric balance between available soil nutrients and microbial communities, thereby impacting ecosystem functioning. Using a long-term field trial, we investigated the effects of four contrasting mowing treatments with/without nitrogen (N) addition on the elemental concentrations and stoichiometries of soil, plant, and microbial biomass. Retaining biomass after mowing resulted in lower C:N and C:P in plant shoots (C:N = 18.8, C:P = 283.9) compared with never mowing (C:N = 24.5, C:P = 493.4). Similarly, the mean soil available C:N when retaining biomass after mowing (C:N = 2.68) was lower than the ratio in the never mown grassland (C:N = 3.44). Removing biomass after mowing strongly depleted soil available phosphorus (P) concentration, leading to significantly higher C:P (C:P = 16.10) than that in the never mown grassland (C:P = 3.85). There were no significant differences in soil available carbon (C) concentration among the treatments, indicating that shifts in the C:N and C:P ratios of available resources were largely due to differences in nutrient rather than C availability. Despite differences in the stoichiometry of available resources, microbial biomass C:N and C:P was similar among treatments and consistently higher than those for the available substrates. This indicates that soil microbes were unresponsive to varying nutrient availability across treatments, suggesting they may be C- rather than nutrient-limited. In this long-term trial, microbial stoichiometry was resilient to soil P depletion and insensitive to N addition. The components of agroecosystems (plants, soil, and soil microorganisms) can contrast in their stoichiometries. Managing one component’s nutrient limitation may have little influence with that of the other components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 110017"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925005493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland management practices can disrupt the stoichiometric balance between available soil nutrients and microbial communities, thereby impacting ecosystem functioning. Using a long-term field trial, we investigated the effects of four contrasting mowing treatments with/without nitrogen (N) addition on the elemental concentrations and stoichiometries of soil, plant, and microbial biomass. Retaining biomass after mowing resulted in lower C:N and C:P in plant shoots (C:N = 18.8, C:P = 283.9) compared with never mowing (C:N = 24.5, C:P = 493.4). Similarly, the mean soil available C:N when retaining biomass after mowing (C:N = 2.68) was lower than the ratio in the never mown grassland (C:N = 3.44). Removing biomass after mowing strongly depleted soil available phosphorus (P) concentration, leading to significantly higher C:P (C:P = 16.10) than that in the never mown grassland (C:P = 3.85). There were no significant differences in soil available carbon (C) concentration among the treatments, indicating that shifts in the C:N and C:P ratios of available resources were largely due to differences in nutrient rather than C availability. Despite differences in the stoichiometry of available resources, microbial biomass C:N and C:P was similar among treatments and consistently higher than those for the available substrates. This indicates that soil microbes were unresponsive to varying nutrient availability across treatments, suggesting they may be C- rather than nutrient-limited. In this long-term trial, microbial stoichiometry was resilient to soil P depletion and insensitive to N addition. The components of agroecosystems (plants, soil, and soil microorganisms) can contrast in their stoichiometries. Managing one component’s nutrient limitation may have little influence with that of the other components.
草地长期生物量去除会降低植物和土壤磷,增加碳磷化学计量,但不会导致微生物磷限制
草地管理措施会破坏土壤有效养分和微生物群落之间的化学计量平衡,从而影响生态系统功能。通过长期田间试验,研究了4种不同刈割方式加/不加氮对土壤、植物和微生物生物量元素浓度和化学计量的影响。刈割后保留生物量使植株枝条C:N和C:P含量(C:N = 18.8,C:P = 283.9)低于不刈割(C:N = 24.5,C:P = 493.4)。同样,刈割后保留生物量的平均土壤有效C:N (C:N = 2.68)也低于未刈割草地(C:N = 3.44)。刈割后去除生物质使土壤速效磷(P)浓度严重耗竭,导致C:P (C:P = 16.10)显著高于未刈割草地(C:P = 3.85)。土壤有效碳(C)浓度在不同处理间无显著差异,说明有效资源C:N和C:P比值的变化主要是由于养分的差异而非C有效性的差异。尽管有效资源的化学计量学存在差异,但不同处理的微生物生物量C:N和C:P相似,且始终高于有效基质。这表明土壤微生物对不同处理的养分有效性变化没有反应,表明它们可能是C限制而不是营养限制。在这项长期试验中,微生物化学计量学对土壤P耗竭具有弹性,对N添加不敏感。农业生态系统的组成部分(植物、土壤和土壤微生物)在化学计量上可以形成对比。控制一种成分的营养限制可能对其他成分的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信