From NMR signals to fluid volumes: accurate quantification of shale fluids via a multi-component/nanopore-coupled framework

IF 7.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fuel Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137045
Xinbin Zhao , Min Wang , Junyang Chen , Yu Sun , Min Wang , Junliang Li , Xiaohao Li
{"title":"From NMR signals to fluid volumes: accurate quantification of shale fluids via a multi-component/nanopore-coupled framework","authors":"Xinbin Zhao ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Junyang Chen ,&nbsp;Yu Sun ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Junliang Li ,&nbsp;Xiaohao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) technology serves as a critical tool for fluid evaluation in shale reservoirs; however, its accuracy relies on reliable conversion of relaxation signals to fluid volume. Current research predominantly focuses on identifying hydrogen-containing components while neglecting systematic calibration of quantitative conversion relationships. This study establishes a free-state/nano-pore coupled calibration method, constructing a comprehensive calibration framework using multiple hydrogen-nucleus-density fluids (crude oil + formation water + crude oil components). Validation was achieved through fluid dynamic loss experiments on sealed core samples and distillation–extraction tests. Key findings include: (1) Free-state calibration reveals that the crude oil-formation water combination better replicates in-situ characteristics. The calibration coefficient k-value increases from 3,590.9 to 6,027.1 (a 68 % rise) with thermal maturity (R<sub>0</sub>: 0.7 %–1.67 %), yet decreases from 4,350.8 to 3,816.5 (a 12.3 % reduction) with increasing salinity, showing statistically high consistency (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89) with the crude oil component calibration model; (2) Under shale nano-pore confinement, the calibration conversion coefficient (k) for crude oil decreases slightly (6.5 %), while that for formation water increases modestly (5.29 %); (3) Quantitative results from this calibration system demonstrate high consistency between NMR and distillation–extraction evaluations. This research overcomes prior limitations in free-state fluid calibration, elucidates quantitative regulatory patterns of thermal maturity and salinity on k-values, quantifies nano-pore confinement effects on conversion coefficients, and ensures accuracy via a dedicated calibration coefficient verification model. The framework advances shale fluid quantification from “empirical estimation” to in-situ precision quantification, providing technical support for target zone optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"406 ","pages":"Article 137045"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001623612502770X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) technology serves as a critical tool for fluid evaluation in shale reservoirs; however, its accuracy relies on reliable conversion of relaxation signals to fluid volume. Current research predominantly focuses on identifying hydrogen-containing components while neglecting systematic calibration of quantitative conversion relationships. This study establishes a free-state/nano-pore coupled calibration method, constructing a comprehensive calibration framework using multiple hydrogen-nucleus-density fluids (crude oil + formation water + crude oil components). Validation was achieved through fluid dynamic loss experiments on sealed core samples and distillation–extraction tests. Key findings include: (1) Free-state calibration reveals that the crude oil-formation water combination better replicates in-situ characteristics. The calibration coefficient k-value increases from 3,590.9 to 6,027.1 (a 68 % rise) with thermal maturity (R0: 0.7 %–1.67 %), yet decreases from 4,350.8 to 3,816.5 (a 12.3 % reduction) with increasing salinity, showing statistically high consistency (R2 = 0.89) with the crude oil component calibration model; (2) Under shale nano-pore confinement, the calibration conversion coefficient (k) for crude oil decreases slightly (6.5 %), while that for formation water increases modestly (5.29 %); (3) Quantitative results from this calibration system demonstrate high consistency between NMR and distillation–extraction evaluations. This research overcomes prior limitations in free-state fluid calibration, elucidates quantitative regulatory patterns of thermal maturity and salinity on k-values, quantifies nano-pore confinement effects on conversion coefficients, and ensures accuracy via a dedicated calibration coefficient verification model. The framework advances shale fluid quantification from “empirical estimation” to in-situ precision quantification, providing technical support for target zone optimization.
从核磁共振信号到流体体积:通过多组分/纳米孔耦合框架精确量化页岩流体
核磁共振(NMR)技术是页岩储层流体评价的重要工具;然而,其准确性依赖于松弛信号到流体体积的可靠转换。目前的研究主要集中在含氢组分的识别上,而忽略了定量转换关系的系统校准。本研究建立了自由态/纳米孔隙耦合标定方法,构建了多元氢核密度流体(原油+地层水+原油组分)的综合标定框架。通过密封岩心样品的流体动力损失实验和蒸馏萃取试验验证了该方法的有效性。主要发现包括:(1)自由状态标定表明,原油-地层-水组合较好地复制了原位特征。校正系数k值随热成熟度(R0: 0.7% ~ 1.67%)从3,590.9增加到6,027.1(上升68%),随盐度增加从4,350.8降低到3,816.5(下降12.3%),与原油组分校正模型具有较高的一致性(R2 = 0.89);(2)页岩纳米孔隙约束条件下,原油的标定转换系数(k)略有下降(6.5%),地层水的标定转换系数(k)略有上升(5.29%);(3)该校准系统的定量结果表明,核磁共振与蒸馏萃取评价具有较高的一致性。本研究克服了以往自由状态流体校准的局限性,阐明了热成熟度和盐度对k值的定量调节模式,量化了纳米孔隙限制对转换系数的影响,并通过专用的校准系数验证模型确保了准确性。该框架将页岩流体量化从“经验估计”推进到原位精确量化,为目标层优选提供了技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信