Passive sampling of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by silicone wristbands during wildland fires

IF 3.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jordina Gili , Mar Viana , Barend L. van Drooge
{"title":"Passive sampling of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by silicone wristbands during wildland fires","authors":"Jordina Gili ,&nbsp;Mar Viana ,&nbsp;Barend L. van Drooge","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildland fires, including both wildfires and prescribed burns, emit large quantities of smoke containing hazardous air pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Understanding PAHs concentrations in these smoke-filled environments is key to developing effective mitigation strategies to protect public health and safety. However, conventional measurement strategies are not always feasible in the highly dynamic and logistically complex settings of wildfire events. As a result, alternative approaches are needed, such as the use of silicone wristbands (SWBs) as passive air samplers. In this study, PAHs were analyzed in SWBs worn by firefighters during prescribed burns and wildfires. After deployment, extraction, and GC-MS/MS analysis, PAH air concentrations were calculated using a compound-specific kinetic uptake model. Personal exposure to PAHs was task-specific: wildfire operators and torchers, who ignite the fires, experienced the highest concentrations (mean sum of PAHs ≈ 5000 ng/m<sup>3</sup>), followed by liners, who manage fire boundaries (≈2000 ng/m<sup>3</sup>), while truck drivers exhibited the lowest exposure concentrations (≈100 ng/m<sup>3</sup>), likely due to their roles keeping them farther from the smoke-dense areas. Additionally, to evaluate the SWBs’ ability to capture particle-bound PAHs, PAH air concentrations measured in SWBs were compared with those obtained from PM<sub>2.5</sub> filter sampling. The findings highlight the utility of passive air sampling with SWBs in detecting PAHs and underscore their potential for monitoring exposure concentrations in complex atmospheric environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 121564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025005394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildland fires, including both wildfires and prescribed burns, emit large quantities of smoke containing hazardous air pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Understanding PAHs concentrations in these smoke-filled environments is key to developing effective mitigation strategies to protect public health and safety. However, conventional measurement strategies are not always feasible in the highly dynamic and logistically complex settings of wildfire events. As a result, alternative approaches are needed, such as the use of silicone wristbands (SWBs) as passive air samplers. In this study, PAHs were analyzed in SWBs worn by firefighters during prescribed burns and wildfires. After deployment, extraction, and GC-MS/MS analysis, PAH air concentrations were calculated using a compound-specific kinetic uptake model. Personal exposure to PAHs was task-specific: wildfire operators and torchers, who ignite the fires, experienced the highest concentrations (mean sum of PAHs ≈ 5000 ng/m3), followed by liners, who manage fire boundaries (≈2000 ng/m3), while truck drivers exhibited the lowest exposure concentrations (≈100 ng/m3), likely due to their roles keeping them farther from the smoke-dense areas. Additionally, to evaluate the SWBs’ ability to capture particle-bound PAHs, PAH air concentrations measured in SWBs were compared with those obtained from PM2.5 filter sampling. The findings highlight the utility of passive air sampling with SWBs in detecting PAHs and underscore their potential for monitoring exposure concentrations in complex atmospheric environments.

Abstract Image

用硅胶腕带对野火中大气多环芳烃的被动采样
荒地火灾,包括野火和规定的燃烧,释放出大量含有有害空气污染物的烟雾,如多环芳烃(PAHs)。了解这些烟雾弥漫的环境中多环芳烃的浓度是制定有效缓解战略以保护公众健康和安全的关键。然而,传统的测量策略在高度动态和物流复杂的野火事件中并不总是可行的。因此,需要替代方法,例如使用硅胶腕带(swb)作为被动空气采样器。在这项研究中,对消防员在规定的烧伤和野火中穿着的swb进行了多环芳烃分析。经过部署、提取和GC-MS/MS分析,使用化合物特异性动力学摄取模型计算空气中多环芳烃的浓度。个人对多环芳烃的暴露具有特定的任务:点燃火灾的野火操作者和火炬手的多环芳烃浓度最高(平均浓度≈5000 ng/m3),其次是管理火场的班轮工人(≈2000 ng/m3),而卡车司机的暴露浓度最低(≈100 ng/m3),这可能是由于他们的角色使他们远离烟雾密集地区。此外,为了评估swb捕获颗粒结合的多环芳烃的能力,将swb中测量的多环芳烃空气浓度与PM2.5过滤器采样所得的浓度进行了比较。研究结果强调了SWBs被动空气采样在检测多环芳烃方面的效用,并强调了它们在复杂大气环境中监测暴露浓度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信