Machining-induced damage in milling of Cf/SiC composites: mechanisms and evaluation methods

IF 8.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Zhiwen Nian, Guolong Zhao, Li Zhu, Haotian Yang, Liang Li
{"title":"Machining-induced damage in milling of Cf/SiC composites: mechanisms and evaluation methods","authors":"Zhiwen Nian,&nbsp;Guolong Zhao,&nbsp;Li Zhu,&nbsp;Haotian Yang,&nbsp;Liang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide (C<sub>f</sub>/SiC) composites have been widely utilized in the aerospace industry due to their high specific strength and ablation resistance. However, owing to their high hardness, brittleness, and anisotropy, machining-induced damages are prone to occur. In this study, the formation mechanisms of milling-induced damage in C<sub>f</sub>/SiC composites were investigated. The results demonstrated that pit damage, as the most prominent form of milling-induced damage, exhibits three primary formation mechanisms: crushing damage caused by axial machining loads compressing subsurface inherent defects, extrusion cracking damage resulting from radial-load-induced crack propagation along fiber bundles, and fragment spalling damage occurring when the tool’s compressive and scraping actions on fragments within inherent defects cause damage expansion. A novel damage evaluation model for milling C<sub>f</sub>/SiC composites was established by weighting the maximum damage depth with the ratio of newly generated damage area to the total machined area. A response prediction model for the damage index was developed with respect to three parameters: cutting speed, feed pre tooth, and radial depth of cut. Verification tests conducted with the optimized parameters yielded results with a deviation of 2.26% from the predicted model, confirming the reliability of the prediction model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":282,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109322"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X25006165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide (Cf/SiC) composites have been widely utilized in the aerospace industry due to their high specific strength and ablation resistance. However, owing to their high hardness, brittleness, and anisotropy, machining-induced damages are prone to occur. In this study, the formation mechanisms of milling-induced damage in Cf/SiC composites were investigated. The results demonstrated that pit damage, as the most prominent form of milling-induced damage, exhibits three primary formation mechanisms: crushing damage caused by axial machining loads compressing subsurface inherent defects, extrusion cracking damage resulting from radial-load-induced crack propagation along fiber bundles, and fragment spalling damage occurring when the tool’s compressive and scraping actions on fragments within inherent defects cause damage expansion. A novel damage evaluation model for milling Cf/SiC composites was established by weighting the maximum damage depth with the ratio of newly generated damage area to the total machined area. A response prediction model for the damage index was developed with respect to three parameters: cutting speed, feed pre tooth, and radial depth of cut. Verification tests conducted with the optimized parameters yielded results with a deviation of 2.26% from the predicted model, confirming the reliability of the prediction model.
Cf/SiC复合材料铣削加工损伤机理及评价方法
碳纤维增强碳化硅(Cf/SiC)复合材料具有高比强度和抗烧蚀性能,在航空航天领域得到了广泛的应用。然而,由于其高硬度、脆性和各向异性,容易发生加工损伤。研究了Cf/SiC复合材料铣削损伤的形成机制。结果表明,坑损伤是铣削诱发损伤中最突出的一种形式,其主要形成机制有三种:轴向加工载荷压缩亚表面固有缺陷导致的破碎损伤,径向载荷诱导的纤维束裂纹扩展导致的挤压开裂损伤,刀具对固有缺陷内碎片的压缩和刮擦作用导致损伤扩展导致的碎片剥落损伤。通过将最大损伤深度与新生成损伤面积占总加工面积之比加权,建立了一种新的铣削Cf/SiC复合材料损伤评价模型。建立了基于切削速度、进给预齿和径向切削深度三个参数的损伤指标响应预测模型。利用优化后的参数进行验证试验,结果与预测模型偏差为2.26%,验证了预测模型的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
492
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing is a comprehensive journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies, short communications, and letters covering various aspects of composite materials science and technology. This includes fibrous and particulate reinforcements in polymeric, metallic, and ceramic matrices, as well as 'natural' composites like wood and biological materials. The journal addresses topics such as properties, design, and manufacture of reinforcing fibers and particles, novel architectures and concepts, multifunctional composites, advancements in fabrication and processing, manufacturing science, process modeling, experimental mechanics, microstructural characterization, interfaces, prediction and measurement of mechanical, physical, and chemical behavior, and performance in service. Additionally, articles on economic and commercial aspects, design, and case studies are welcomed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review to ensure they contribute significantly and innovatively, maintaining high standards for content and presentation. The editorial team aims to expedite the review process for prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信