Jian-Kang Lu , Gui-Juan Zheng , Jing-Jing Li , Xiao-Xia Jiang , Jin-Xin Zhan , Chang-Hao Yu , Xu Wang , Yi-Xuan Zeng , Tian-Jiao Qi , Hong Liu , Hui-Ming Peng , Jin-Bo Fang
{"title":"Secondary metabolites from the arial parts of Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss. and their chemotaxonomic significance","authors":"Jian-Kang Lu , Gui-Juan Zheng , Jing-Jing Li , Xiao-Xia Jiang , Jin-Xin Zhan , Chang-Hao Yu , Xu Wang , Yi-Xuan Zeng , Tian-Jiao Qi , Hong Liu , Hui-Ming Peng , Jin-Bo Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A phytochemical investigation of aerial parts of <em>Hyssopus cuspidatus</em> Boriss. led to the isolation of twenty compounds <strong>1</strong>–<strong>20</strong>, including terpenoids (<strong>1</strong>−<strong>11</strong>), jasmonates (<strong>12</strong> and <strong>13</strong>), phenylpropanoids (<strong>14</strong>−<strong>16</strong>), and phenols (<strong>17</strong>−<strong>20</strong>). Compound <strong>12</strong> was determined as a new natural occurring, which was initially reported as a synthetic product. The structures of these structures were identified based on extensive spectroscopic methods as well as comparison with literature data. Compounds <strong>10</strong>–<strong>12</strong> were firstly acquired from the Lamiaceae family. Compounds <strong>1</strong>, <strong>3</strong>, <strong>5</strong>–<strong>8</strong>, <strong>13</strong>, <strong>17</strong>, <strong>19</strong>, and <strong>20</strong> were isolated from <em>H</em>. <em>cuspidatus</em> for the first time and also newly identified within the genus <em>Hyssopus</em>. The chemotaxonomic significance of these isolated compounds was also described.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 105149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030519782500198X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A phytochemical investigation of aerial parts of Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss. led to the isolation of twenty compounds 1–20, including terpenoids (1−11), jasmonates (12 and 13), phenylpropanoids (14−16), and phenols (17−20). Compound 12 was determined as a new natural occurring, which was initially reported as a synthetic product. The structures of these structures were identified based on extensive spectroscopic methods as well as comparison with literature data. Compounds 10–12 were firstly acquired from the Lamiaceae family. Compounds 1, 3, 5–8, 13, 17, 19, and 20 were isolated from H. cuspidatus for the first time and also newly identified within the genus Hyssopus. The chemotaxonomic significance of these isolated compounds was also described.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.