Erratum to “Microdosimetry-based characterization of X-ray irradiators and dose enhancement factor study for cell monolayer irradiation” [Radiat. Phys. Chem. 238 (2026) 113182]

IF 2.8 3区物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL

Radiation Physics and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113336

I.S. Gordeev

{"title":"Erratum to “Microdosimetry-based characterization of X-ray irradiators and dose enhancement factor study for cell monolayer irradiation” [Radiat. Phys. Chem. 238 (2026) 113182]","authors":"I.S. Gordeev","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the published article, the mean values of the track-averaged (LETt) and dose-averaged (LETd) linear energy transfer were calculated using histograms with a bin width of 0.5 keV/<mml:math altimg=\"si18.svg\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>. This binning resolution was insufficient, leading to inaccuracies in the reported mean values. Recalculation with a finer bin width of 0.05 keV/<mml:math altimg=\"si18.svg\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> yielded corrected values, which are presented in the revised Table 3 and Figures 6, 7. While the numerical values differ from those originally reported — most notably for 60Co and for the LETd the overall trends and conclusions of the original study remain unchanged. These corrections improve the quantitative accuracy of the results for all irradiation conditions (air, mylar, and glass).","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the published article, the mean values of the track-averaged (LETt) and dose-averaged (LETd) linear energy transfer were calculated using histograms with a bin width of 0.5 keV/μm. This binning resolution was insufficient, leading to inaccuracies in the reported mean values. Recalculation with a finer bin width of 0.05 keV/μm yielded corrected values, which are presented in the revised Table 3 and Figures 6, 7. While the numerical values differ from those originally reported — most notably for 60Co and for the LETd the overall trends and conclusions of the original study remain unchanged. These corrections improve the quantitative accuracy of the results for all irradiation conditions (air, mylar, and glass).

查看原文本刊更多论文

《基于微剂量学的x射线辐照剂的特性和细胞单层辐照的剂量增强因子研究》的勘误。理论物理。化学。238 (2026)113182]

在已发表的文章中，采用柱状图计算了径迹平均（LETt）和剂量平均（LETd）线性能量传递的平均值，柱状图宽度为0.5 keV/μm。这种分门别类的解决方案是不够的，导致报告的平均值不准确。在更细的仓宽0.05 keV/μm下重新计算得到了修正值，如修正后的表3和图6、7所示。虽然数值与最初报告的不同——最明显的是60Co和led，但原始研究的总体趋势和结论保持不变。这些校正提高了在所有辐照条件下（空气、聚酯薄膜和玻璃）结果的定量准确性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

574

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.