Toward a Sustainable Future: A Holistic Environmental, Social, and Economic Assessment of Industrial Recycling for All-Solid-State Batteries with Oxide-Based Electrolytes

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ziyu Wang, , , Xuelin Tian, , , Shan Zhao, , , Peng Zhang, , and , Chunjiang An*, 
{"title":"Toward a Sustainable Future: A Holistic Environmental, Social, and Economic Assessment of Industrial Recycling for All-Solid-State Batteries with Oxide-Based Electrolytes","authors":"Ziyu Wang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Xuelin Tian,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Shan Zhao,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Chunjiang An*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c12122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries has raised concerns about resource scarcity, battery accident risks, and end-of-life battery management. All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are emerging as a promising alternative due to their higher energy density and thermal stability. However, the large-scale production of ASSBs necessitates the development of sustainable recycling strategies to address resource constraints and environmental challenges. This study proposes an innovative framework integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate the environmental, social, and economic performance of three recycling methods, pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and direct recycling, for two types of oxide-based ASSBs (with LLZO and LATP electrolytes). The results indicate that hydrometallurgical recycling, particularly for LLZO batteries, offers the most sustainable solution by balancing environmental benefits, social impact, and cost-effectiveness. Direct recycling, while economically advantageous, faces technical uncertainties. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses further validate the robustness of the findings, providing a comprehensive decision-making tool for future battery disposal strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 41","pages":"21957–21966"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c12122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing demand for lithium-ion batteries has raised concerns about resource scarcity, battery accident risks, and end-of-life battery management. All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are emerging as a promising alternative due to their higher energy density and thermal stability. However, the large-scale production of ASSBs necessitates the development of sustainable recycling strategies to address resource constraints and environmental challenges. This study proposes an innovative framework integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate the environmental, social, and economic performance of three recycling methods, pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and direct recycling, for two types of oxide-based ASSBs (with LLZO and LATP electrolytes). The results indicate that hydrometallurgical recycling, particularly for LLZO batteries, offers the most sustainable solution by balancing environmental benefits, social impact, and cost-effectiveness. Direct recycling, while economically advantageous, faces technical uncertainties. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses further validate the robustness of the findings, providing a comprehensive decision-making tool for future battery disposal strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

迈向可持续发展的未来:对含氧化物电解质的全固态电池工业回收的整体环境、社会和经济评估
锂离子电池需求的增长引发了人们对资源短缺、电池事故风险和电池报废管理的担忧。全固态电池(assb)由于其更高的能量密度和热稳定性而成为一种有前途的替代方案。然而,assb的大规模生产需要制定可持续的回收战略,以解决资源限制和环境挑战。本研究提出了一个整合生命周期评估(LCA)和多标准决策分析(MCDA)的创新框架,以评估两种氧化物基assb(含LLZO和LATP电解质)的三种回收方法,即火法冶金、湿法冶金和直接回收的环境、社会和经济绩效。结果表明,湿法冶金回收,特别是对于LLZO电池,通过平衡环境效益、社会影响和成本效益,提供了最可持续的解决方案。直接回收虽然具有经济优势,但面临技术上的不确定性。灵敏度和不确定性分析进一步验证了研究结果的稳健性,为未来的电池处理策略提供了全面的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信